Trending Content - Off Topic Forum
| +40 | SpaceX IPO - what are your thoughts | 9 | 5m |
| +28 | Should I use Claude or chatgpt? | 15 | 6h |
| +21 | Funny Things to Say to Interns | 7 | 9h |
| +17 | How did you meet your significant other/partner? | 13 | 22h |
| +17 | London's future as a financial centre | 18 | 1d |
| The Great Debate | 9 | 10h | |
| +7 | E ink/electronic notepads | 4 | 23h |
| +6 | Stay Sharp All Day With Best Modvigil 200 MG Tablet | 0 | 19h |
| +6 | Test post will be deleted automatically. | 11 | 1d |
| +5 | get a model before you model | 3 | 2d |
Career Resources
K
K?
I mean, yeah, fact of the matter is most guys who claim they’d rather “sacrifice” looks for wits, personality, etc. are neglecting the fact that the two are not mutually exclusive like their comment implies. However, I do think finding a woman who A) is a smoke, B) you get along with really well, and C) you happen to bump into in the universe and have a shot at dating is a lot more rare than finding a girl who checks just boxes A or B. And most guys see a lot of women who check one of the boxes, and choose not to wait around for a woman who checks all of them. Not incredibly groundbreaking. Pretty lazy way to go about picking a partner, but then again that’s a lot of humanity at work. I applaud you for going after the one who has it all, though, that’s probably a more optimistic/self-respecting way of looking at things.
Quisquam repudiandae est et et. Ut ad voluptatem ea sunt qui iusto quo. Beatae dolorem qui quis dolorem. Cumque vero vel veniam aut adipisci. Repellendus dolores sunt quia. Et eum illo aut eos sunt ex.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...