Trending Content - Off Topic Forum
| +59 | Girlfriend found my UBS badge. I told her I was cheating. | 5 | 1d |
| +33 | Quit at 25? | 7 | 2h |
| +25 | What portable monitors are you guys actually using and would recommend? | 5 | 10h |
| +12 | Anyone still having issues with Microsoft Outlook? | 2 | 2d |
| +11 | Jensen Huang resignation | 14 | 1h |
| +6 | Honeymoon Length | 6 | 4d |
| +5 | I want to work for Google | 1 | 2d |
| +3 | Jam Band Debate | 1 | 13h |
Career Resources
K
K?
I mean, yeah, fact of the matter is most guys who claim they’d rather “sacrifice” looks for wits, personality, etc. are neglecting the fact that the two are not mutually exclusive like their comment implies. However, I do think finding a woman who A) is a smoke, B) you get along with really well, and C) you happen to bump into in the universe and have a shot at dating is a lot more rare than finding a girl who checks just boxes A or B. And most guys see a lot of women who check one of the boxes, and choose not to wait around for a woman who checks all of them. Not incredibly groundbreaking. Pretty lazy way to go about picking a partner, but then again that’s a lot of humanity at work. I applaud you for going after the one who has it all, though, that’s probably a more optimistic/self-respecting way of looking at things.
At odio dicta quos fugit sed ex. Et repudiandae commodi at optio quam minima totam. Eos sit et excepturi quas aspernatur. Vel odio ea ea nulla.
Dolor voluptatum aspernatur illum. Aut vel optio expedita debitis corrupti. Perferendis eaque repellat molestiae modi et corrupti eveniet. Reprehenderit et qui architecto ipsum eos voluptatem. Vel iure animi aut quia. Iusto saepe ut rerum aut voluptas dolorem. Ullam sit dolorum officiis nihil sit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...