NYC Social Clubs (Soho House & Others)

Just curious what the landscape is currently for these sorts of things.  Seems evident that Soho House has lost its shine over the last couple of years, I know several members complaining that they'll allow anyone in these days (not lost on me that us finance folks are probably their definition of "anyone" lol).

Are their other clubs people like? What's the future of these kinds of places?  It's just an interesting area IMHO because it's gone a lot of different directions in the past (Harvard/Yale club type settings) and the future could look different as well . . for example I can clearly see some of the high-end gyms trying to position themselves as a social club too . . Lifetime even calls itself an "urban country club" which is ridiculous but illustrates the goal.

Seems like people in big cities with extra cash want to have a space of their own, but the world hasn't quite figured it out yet.  All thoughts welcome!

14 Comments
 

If I was more reckless with my money and lived closer to the west side, I'd join CCC (classic cars club). I think activity / hobby focused clubs like this are cooler than the SoHo house type thing. A lot of high rollers frequent CCC, and they have some pretty cool events you can go to if you have a friend that is a member.

Go all the way
 

Yep.  I was a member there till recently.  It's not very expensive to join, but the two issues are (i) as you allude to, the schlep over there makes it difficult to enjoy the benefits if you're working long hours and (ii) it gets expensive real quick if you want to drive the cars.

Agree with your overal sentiment that these clubs might need more of a bond between the members in order to really stick.  

 

You can't manufacture community like some (MFG) seem to think. This is just called being part of a "scene" which is not really possible for finance types given the lack of time and boring/hardo personalities. People in the art world, modeling, entertainment, fashion subcultures, food industry whatever have restaurants/bars/clubs/events they frequent and make friends at, they don't need some expensive well decorated room to do it. 

 

That's a good point.  Makes me wonder about the original intent behind Soho House. The story is, they wanted a place for creatives to congregate.  But to your point, that's not something creatives have ever really needed.  Maybe it was really just about luring the bougies with a false angle about creatives.  

 

Yes, probably. FWIW soho house is one of the few successful ones to do this and I don't hate the idea. But I think it became extremely corporatized as soon as people saw the success of soho house. Now we have members only italian restaurants probably populated by stupid influencers and sleazy dropshipping/crypto people who think Saltbae restaurant is the epitome of fine dining. 

 
Most Helpful

What you’re alluding to towards the end with the social club and gym blending is more or less coming into focus out on the west coast.

Theres a place called Heimat that’s a high end gym, has coworking spaces, and has a rooftop bar with a pool. They’ve partnered with some high end vegan chef who opened a restaurant in their building as well to draw people in. 

I’m also seeing an increasing number of social wellness clubs where you can get IV infusions, do Hot/Cold immersion therapy, hyperbaric chambers, full service spa treatments, etc. for a monthly price. 

My problem with these things and gyms in particular is that they’re often not worth the money. Equinox for example is seen as the gold standard of gyms but as a former college athlete in my opinion sucks. The equipment is average at best with no unique equipment (IR sauna’s/Cold Plunges/Hyperbaric Chambers/etc.) and the amenities are mediocre. Equinox and similar concepts in my opinion are lifestyle brands for people with no taste who want to appear as well off or sophisticated. 

The other issue I have with these things are that like an AmEx Platinum they’re not cost prohibitive enough, which leads to overcrowding and undesirables. For $200/month or $750/year almost anyone can get in which leads to wannabe influencers, social climbers, 30K millionaire types with their used BMW 3 series, and women with shady motives into the ecosystem. 

I do recognize though it’s tricky to find a balance in that space though. Once you price at a certain level you’re competing for a handful of people with actual country clubs which would be a really tough battle to win. I’d personally be willing to spend $1-1.5K/month for something like I described but my guess is that I’d be in the minority. 

 

"Equinox and similar concepts in my opinion are lifestyle brands for people with no taste who want to appear as well off or sophisticated."

Hit the nail on the head right there.  Your next comment on Amex Platinum applies there as well.  With Equinox, Amex Platinum, and several other things (Soho House seems to have become this) it feels like what's really being sold is self-esteem more so than the direct value of the thing.

I also like your idea of the $1k monthly space.  While it would be steep for me, I'd probably rather do that than pay $300 for a Lifetime Fitness that's still crowded and pretty mid in a lot of ways.

 

Everyone who has an Equinox membership would be shocked and outraged if they found out that the amount of money they’re paying for only a gym is what members of NYC social clubs pay for a gym, pool, sauna, a country club, tennis courts, access to dozens of events, rooftops, and 4-5 bars in the same building. 

 

The only clubs worth joining are invitation-only (i.e. you can't apply online and you need multiple current members to recommend you for admission).

They were almost all formed during the gilded-age (mid-to-late 1800s), which means that they do have a rather old/aging membership base. That being said, at least within the last 30-40 years, the younger membership coalition in each of these clubs has been booming and the clubs have become really fun.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chewco
 

As a rule, most of the university clubs suck. Most are designed for alums aged 60+ and have a very geriatric feel. They are full of senseless rules (like no electronics in the library) and even treat their own members like garbage. The Penn Club is open to those from so many different schools (Haverford, Bryn Mawr, other Ivies) that it dilutes the unified identity and purpose of the club. There's also just something distasteful about a club where the criteria has literally no social criteria to be admitted--just having attended a particular academic institution. I think that model is on the decline and will continue to be in the coming decades. 

When it comes to the "social" clubs, the difference between the trendy wave of artsy Millennial inventions (SoHo House, Zero Bond, etc.) is that at those clubs, the likely references are your work acquaintances, college friends, or the random dude you met at a rave. When we're talking about the old New York clubs (Union Club, NYAC, Knickerbocker, etc.), it's your fucking boss who is inviting you. Or a family friend who is a senior partner at a law firm. Or your future father-in-law who is an MD somewhere and has been a club member for 25 years. It's just a different league of establishment. Many of these older clubs are inexpensive to join, because the clubs are already wealthy and money is far from being a primary factor in judging a prospective member's fitness. 

 

Ut sit a architecto error est mollitia. Voluptatem modi adipisci voluptates sint. Officiis temporibus doloremque quod nihil qui rerum.

Cumque iusto inventore minus omnis et possimus voluptas hic. Dolor enim non fuga aut. Quia corrupti soluta similique ab nulla enim et.

Autem fugiat tempore et ab enim consequatur et. Sapiente reprehenderit natus voluptas necessitatibus rerum sed eligendi. Quisquam debitis libero culpa a.

Expedita corporis et voluptas voluptas assumenda illum perspiciatis. Aliquam libero officiis sunt velit accusamus quia numquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”