14 Comments
 

While I want to hate the TSA, I know the second something happens on a plane all the people who have pissed and moaned the loudest will condemn the TSA for not being stringent enough.

The USA Today had a poll. 85% of the public approve of the scanners. 15% do not. In America a loud minority will always overrule a quiet majority. Those 15% are the people who bitched and moans for more security when 9/11 happened.

You either live with inconvenience or accept the risk.

 
Best Response
Anthony .While I want to hate the TSA, I know the second something happens on a plane all the people who have pissed and moaned the loudest will condemn the TSA for not being stringent enough.

The USA Today had a poll. 85% of the public approve of the scanners. 15% do not. In America a loud minority will always overrule a quiet majority. Those 15% are the people who bitched and moans for more security when 9/11 happened.

You either live with inconvenience or accept the risk.

I'm all for coming up with solutions instead of bitching and moaning. So I have an idea, airlines have to use their own private security to inspect passengers. This generates competition among airlines as well as makes them liable for anything that may happen on one of their planes. I like this because:

  • It is probably much more cost effective than the TSA
  • Airlines have an incentive to not have their planes blown to pieces by a shoe bomber, both for reasons of liability, public image, and lost cash flow/higher insurance cost from the events
  • If passengers do not like the security measures of a certain airline when they inspect passengers, they can choose another airline, generating competition for better service (something that I have felt is missing from a number of personal stories)
  • It is proven that TSA agents cannot find bombs, guns, knives, etc in training runs, even when they know the date, person, and whereabouts of the weapon, making me question whether we are actually safer as opposed to feeling safer.

Thoughts?

 
FXTrading
Anthony .While I want to hate the TSA, I know the second something happens on a plane all the people who have pissed and moaned the loudest will condemn the TSA for not being stringent enough.

The USA Today had a poll. 85% of the public approve of the scanners. 15% do not. In America a loud minority will always overrule a quiet majority. Those 15% are the people who bitched and moans for more security when 9/11 happened.

You either live with inconvenience or accept the risk.

I'm all for coming up with solutions instead of bitching and moaning. So I have an idea, airlines have to use their own private security to inspect passengers. This generates competition among airlines as well as makes them liable for anything that may happen on one of their planes. I like this because:

  • It is probably much more cost effective than the TSA
  • Airlines have an incentive to not have their planes blown to pieces by a shoe bomber, both for reasons of liability, public image, and lost cash flow/higher insurance cost from the events
  • If passengers do not like the security measures of a certain airline when they inspect passengers, they can choose another airline, generating competition for better service (something that I have felt is missing from a number of personal stories)
  • It is proven that TSA agents cannot find bombs, guns, knives, etc in training runs, even when they know the date, person, and whereabouts of the weapon, making me question whether we are actually safer as opposed to feeling safer.

Thoughts?

This sounds to me like the best way to split the difference. We put airlines in charge of any damage caused by bombed planes (include ground damage, etc.). We let the free market solve this problem.

Mad Max types who don't give a shit report to Cowboy Airways

Scared soccer moms report to Anal Probe Express

 

I'm loving Ron Paul. He does manage to stick to his ideals more so than anyone else I've seen in congress. He also has a very strong movement backing him. Perhaps he is the white knight for fiscal conservatives who disagree with republicans on social and foreign policy issues.

looking for that pick-me-up to power through an all-nighter?
 

It's true.....they could show a snuff film on C-Span and no one would notice.

"Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, for knowledge has marked the upward surge of mankind. And greed, you mark my words, will not only save Teldar Paper, but that other malfunctioning corporation called the USA."
 
Gekko21It's true.....they could show a snuff film on C-Span and no one would notice.

Shit works better than Nyquil

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

I agree. Let the 15% who bitch about a fuzzy scan of your body go to the free for all airline. If something happens they have no right to complain either.

 

There was a poll and out of 1000 people 999 agreed to beat the richest person to death and take all his money.

Therefore it HAS to be right!

 

Voluptate occaecati eum vero cumque qui rerum et. Eum odio culpa fugiat quas tenetur itaque. Culpa fugit dicta ut accusamus iure. Sunt perspiciatis natus repellat corrupti. Praesentium porro excepturi est consequatur.

Aut ut quia velit dolorum dignissimos sapiente aut omnis. Eos qui nesciunt deserunt id. Et voluptas accusamus corrupti et porro unde.

Soluta cum unde at vel id pariatur aut sit. Minus quia enim voluptatem velit sunt. Praesentium doloribus aspernatur excepturi est. Dolorem perspiciatis quod explicabo pariatur quas et dignissimos. Sunt ut illum est voluptas. Ut aspernatur ullam mollitia voluptatem atque.

Sunt animi corrupti illo non rerum quam rerum. Et quas cumque accusantium suscipit. Excepturi minima ut tenetur illo modi minima. Id recusandae quibusdam quam debitis quod ducimus nihil. Sit vel quia explicabo excepturi iure aut. Fugit neque voluptatibus autem voluptas ducimus excepturi velit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”