Supreme Court upholds the Trump Travel Ban

The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision upholding the Travel Ban is the correct decision. It is actually disappointing that the decision was so narrow. Federal law is pretty clear on this: the President of the United States can prevent a group of foreigners from entering our country for any reason he deems fit in national interest. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, Refugee Act of 1980, and federal statutory code 8 U.S.C. 1182 f, all affirm this principle. The President possesses the sole authority to make that decision, no matter how flawed his reasoning may be. The fact that Trump made asinine comments during the campaign does not diminish his presidential power nor does it address the constitutionality of the executive order itself. It is also clearly NOT a Muslim ban, as the order never mentions religion, and 85% of the Islamic world is not affected by the ban. Even non-Muslims from countries on the ban are included.

Many on the Left are comparing this decision to the infamous 1942 Korematsu ruling. That is an absurd analogy. In Korematsu, the Court affirmed the federal government's power to forcefully intern (without due process or trial) U.S. citizens and legal residents of Japanese descent. The Travel Ban is simply placing a temporary hold on foreigners from certain countries from entering.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/26/supreme-court-rul…

4 Comments
 

Setting aside the Constitutional legality, my thoughts as a libertarian:

What's in our national interest of a blanket travel ban, and why now? Surely there are some people from each of the countries on the list that we would accept as visitors. Feel free to vet travelers and immigrants as thoroughly as necessary / possible - that's well within our rights and common-sense - but this application just seems sloppy and imprecise. What prompted this specific timing and if it is indeed temporary, under what set of circumstances will it end?

Be excellent to each other, and party on, dudes.
 

Quia culpa ut ea incidunt reiciendis aperiam. Quasi et velit dignissimos. Dolorum repellendus voluptatem est quibusdam accusamus unde mollitia. Voluptatem nihil velit quos aut saepe.

In dolores facere animi magni voluptatem in suscipit. Voluptatem sit voluptas sunt tenetur et sit error hic. Ea beatae voluptatibus vero sint. Asperiores enim nihil omnis sed aut magni non qui. Odio saepe eos tempore in necessitatibus. Quis incidunt qui iusto esse cum adipisci est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (77) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”