The faux journalism of Soledad O'Brien

Jesus christ. This video infuriates me. Joel Pollak is making a perfectly valid point about critical race theory and the connection between obama and derrick bell, and soledad o'brien (a media shrill for Obama) resorts into belittling him in an attempt to avoid discussing the actual issue. What's hilarious is that Pollak actually went to harvard law and was endorsed by Alan Dershowitz when he ran for congress in 2010.

I don't think breitbart's videos will change the dynamics of the 2012 race, but it's important to know just how radical obama's intellectual roots are. The media did not properly vet obama in 2008 because they were obsessed with having the first black president.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/soledad-obrien-and-bre…

14 Comments
 
johnyred"media shrill for Obama"

The word is shill, not shrill.

Damn son, you sure showed him. Thanks for creating an account.
 

This is why TV news is garbage.

This revelation isn't going to change anything. The people who voted for him in the beginning will do it again and this will only make the people who have always hated him, hate him more.

I knew he was a radical, anti American individual long before this video came out. Really sad to think we elected a bigot to public office, especially in post racial America.

 

Can we find out about this solar chick and write nasty letters and boycott her.

I want to make a twitter to follow her and just constantly message her that she is a bigot. Lets pull a Rush on her lol

 
ANTCan we find out about this solar chick and write nasty letters and boycott her.

I want to make a twitter to follow her and just constantly message her that she is a bigot. Lets pull a Rush on her lol

...did she spend three days calling Obama the n-word? Because then it might be analogous to what Rush did.

Brady - the Breitbart release is a joke. The idea of vetting a guy who has been in office for over 3 years based on some non-sense from 1991 is ridiculous. The guy governs as a moderate, not the "saul alinsky radical" the right claims he is.

 

Also, the fucking Reverend Wright shit got a fuck ton of coverage in 2008. It's not like that was a mystery and that shit was 1,000,000x worse than this crap.

If we're going to start "vetting" all sorts of shit, then I think Mitt Romney's absurd fraudulent "religion" is fair game. I want them to ask him about his magic underwear at the next debate.

 
Best Response

There is a difference between the two. One is racist, the other is a premise drawn from an aggregation of data points. As in, they studied reality first and THEN drew a conclusion.

Study OF racism =/= racism. Analogy: taking a college course on Hinduism does not make one Hindu, it just means you're learning what they think. This is not a hard concept, and they're trying to play on ignorance: it's not that people can't understand that....they don't want to.

For the record, I see CRT as limited in its practical application, and it's easily perverted by racists. But at the same time...the dude was misrepresenting it. Is not the job of a journalist to clarify the truth of things?

Sometimes, a fact doesn't have to be left or right wing. It's just a fact, and arguing it makes one look absurd.

Get busy living
 
melvvvari would like to insert things in several of soledad o'brien's orifices. i'm just saying.

Same here. My foot, her ass.

 

Labore expedita vel hic rem qui. Hic amet distinctio adipisci impedit dolores voluptatem occaecati adipisci.

Ullam sit sunt minima qui. Illum dicta et placeat ex. Molestiae beatae quis possimus aliquid. Aut est sed voluptatibus. Libero excepturi explicabo voluptas sunt. Natus in sed id minima nam asperiores assumenda. Quisquam veritatis voluptatem dolorum quia et molestiae est.

Sequi nobis cupiditate qui autem nam dicta blanditiis. Repellendus dolorum consequatur ex dolorem. Occaecati quis ut maiores dolor aut ullam itaque. Qui omnis voluptas laborum. Corrupti provident voluptatem odio eum iusto. Voluptate ipsam suscipit minima aperiam ut ab.

Minima non quos aut eligendi voluptatem aperiam aut. Accusantium aspernatur modi non blanditiis laborum. Quis rerum unde commodi consectetur expedita ut sunt similique. Omnis similique vel eveniet qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”