Why Are Junior Bankers More Unattractive Today Than They Were In The Golden Age?

I've noticed from anecdotal evidence my family members in finance have said that analyst classes at BBs and merchant banks used to be filled with tanned 6'3 lacrosse/rugby kids from WHYP + fratty selective schools like Dartmouth who came from Andover/Exeter/Deerfield and embodied the image of a polished banker in every respect, from attire to musculature to hair to their face.

Nowadays the junior bankers I interact with and see on LinkedIn tend to be glasses-wearing, short, acne-riddled lanky indian/asian/diversity kids with haircuts from Supercuts.

Is this even good for business on the sell-side? I get that buy-side is a lot more meritocratic, and who knows, these kids can very well be "smarter" due to their work ethic vs a frat star at UVA PIKE who spends his weekends doing bag and racking up kills, but on the sell-side, appearances matter. After all, it's a sales job, especially as you become an ASO/VP and client interaction is a big part of your day-to-day responsibilities. This means that only extroverted, good looking, charismatic kids of a certain background would thrive. 

Or am I mistaken and these less visually fortunate specimens don't go A2A and tend to exit to more meritocratic buy-side gigs?

37 Comments
 
Controversial

So you think non-white people are ugly and that offends you.

Seriously?

Opinions like this are why diversity hiring exists.  Seriously, someone should pin this post to the top of the Off Topic forum and link it every time we get another "I have a 4.0 and am in [insert third tier private university]'s finance club, how dare a bank give a job to a minority from a State school!" post.

Imagine being so stupid, so bigoted, and having so little awareness that you'd do what this OP did and actually complain that it is a problem that banks aren't hiring enough preppy white kids, solely because you think they're more pleasant to look at!

 

I'd agree with you if this was for PE/HF/VC (anything on the buy-side that's more dependent on meritocracy and has no client interaction responsibilities) but when you're taking on kids for front office roles like IB/S&T/ER that's client-facing or public-facing, it doesn't make sense to hire the ugly ones.

 

BitcoinBonanza

Nobody gives a shit about how bankers look, dude. Just run the numbers and arrange the boxes like you are told.

Lmao 100%. This and give us access to deal flow. Literally don't care about anything else.

OP the "financialization" of your client base is why what you're describing doesn't matter. Your client base is heavily indexed towards financial investors now who care only about returns -> deal flow access / intel. and not as much about kicking it w the boys 

 
Most Helpful

If you were the CFO of a F500 company looking for advisors for a $1bn+ divestiture, which group of bankers would you trust more? Which group of bankers look more competent? Which group of bankers do you think has deeper industry connections to strategic buyers and financial sponsors? Which group of bankers do you think are more polished and have better interpersonal, communication and sales skills?

The old guard of the likes of CVP/GS/PJT from the gilded halls of WHYP and raised in the timeless halls of Eton/Deerfield/Exeter/Andover or the other group?

hDiversity, Equity & Inclusion

n

k

 

This is an odd thread. 

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 

Americans in general are less attractive. Our country has gotten fatter, gayer, and browner. So have the banking classes.

 

Est est eius qui inventore architecto voluptatem nostrum. Impedit quo dolorum et magnam quia exercitationem voluptatibus. Animi laborum facilis quos culpa ducimus occaecati. Eligendi dicta molestias ratione ut asperiores.

Impedit ut dolore ipsa ratione deserunt ut soluta. Quibusdam quo ut est iusto illo mollitia eos. Aut ad voluptas soluta voluptates nostrum autem ipsam aspernatur. Sunt similique molestias natus aspernatur exercitationem quidem. Vel quisquam reiciendis a saepe.

Sint facilis et suscipit aut. Officia sequi cupiditate consectetur aliquid id perspiciatis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”