33 Comments
 

With due respect, have you ever used any word processor besides Word? It is true that you can format your page however you want in Word ... as long as you have enough time and enough hair to tear out. If I want to control the look of my page in a fairly complex document, and want to get it done in half the time, I use WordPerfect. If I just need to slap some text on a page and really don't give a what it looks like when I'm done, I use Word, and let it decide how the finished product should look. Otherwise, I fritter away all sorts of time fighting with it. It does what it wants.

 

Sometimes, yes. I feel like taking a 39-page typewritten contract and getting out a blue gel pen and just writing out the entire damn thing by hand. That is how frustrating Microsoft Word can be sometimes, when it seems to be deliberately attempting to sabotage any sense of goodwill that may have at one time (yesterday) existed in this depressing shithole of a planet.

 

I mean, if you really want formatting, you have to learn LaTex. But that's got a steep learning curve to basic use, and formatting is really terrifying. On the other hand, there are templates which make life a little easier.

Try Lyx out- I heard it's kinda in-between Word and Latex.

 

The problem with TeX is that even if you know it, others will probably not have editing knowledge and will only be able to read it in PDF form.

But TeX is great, especially for math formulas. And it's freeware.

 
tellmewhatyouwantThe problem with TeX is that even if you know it, others will probably not have editing knowledge and will only be able to read it in PDF form.

But TeX is great, especially for math formulas. And it's freeware.

Yeah, it's a major concern. I'm a math major, so that's something I tend to take for granted way too much. That's why I was thinking of Lyx, I heard it's relatively straightforward with a lot of inheritance from Word. But then again, it's probably not standard on a work computer/IT people might throw tantrums if you try to install it.

 
Best Response

I think the only reason it's still around is because it comes with office, and is basically guaranteed to be compatible with old documents.

But Latex is great. Everyone would always marvel how my math homework looked like it was photocopied from the text. You just have to reformat everything to a pdf; most people do not respond well to a .tex file.

Microsoft's product development always confuses me. Its like they're trying to force their "innovations" down users' throats, between their changes to the UI and horrible auto-format preferences. Seriously, fuck the ribbon UI. Windows 8 will be an abomination if they try to make it a core part of the OS.

I think I'd be happiest if they just released updated versions of XP and MS 2003. They do everything you need. The files are organized. Leave the fancy GUI stuff to Apple.

 

I use Adobe InCopy for text based documents and LaTex for scientific based ones. Sometimes I edit my Powerpoint presentations (or text documents) with InDesign to make them look better. And since I got a bunch of flashy and cool looking presets my job is pretty much done.

 

Less than a decade ago, BB banks were using Word to make pitchbooks. The horror...

 
whateverittakesLess than a decade ago, BB banks were using Word to make pitchbooks. The horror...
As far as I know, GS still uses Word and DB was using it as recently as last year.
When one man, for whatever reason, has an opportunity to lead an extraordinary life, he has no right to keep it to himself.
 
Clever Name
whateverittakesLess than a decade ago, BB banks were using Word to make pitchbooks. The horror...
As far as I know, GS still uses Word and DB was using it as recently as last year.
wtf? why?
 

The 2011 Word for Mac is way user friendly for formatting, aligning etc. or maybe the older versions of Word were so shitty, that I got pleasantly surprised when working in the current one?!

 

[quote=Clever Name]Nobody working in banking will you show you one of their books, but there are some floating around the internet that you can look at.

Qatalyst's Autonomy M&A pitch to Oracle is a good example (with some egregious errors by whatever analyst made the book). http://www.scribd.com/doc/66891999/Qatalyst-s-Autonomy-Slides-Set-1[/qu…]

Egregious is way too strong... the book wasn't bad at all, especially because it's a draft and is clearly marked as such. People on this forum need a reality check.

 

Linked the wrong one, my fault. These did go to Oracle (Larry Ellison, no less), as they were leaked from Oracle's own website. So, the "draft" disclaimer is irrelevant. Overall, it's a decent book, but there are multiple errors that are easy to spot. Considering Oracle's M&A team is staffed with former bankers, they can spot these mistakes just as fast, if not faster. It may not be a big deal (in the grand scheme of things, it didn't matter at all, as Oracle clearly wanted to buy Autonomy, but didn't get the chance to), but it's far from perfect.

See thread: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/qatalyst-pitch-books

And your post:

rufiolove^^^ Being overstaffed isn't an excuse for errors that your team will accept... of course with your whopping one post on this forum you clearly know all about that... It's more about the mindset of your work... you always want it to be quality and error free. Now do mistakes slip through the cracks? Yes. But you can't start making excuses for stuff all the time. Also, this isn't a 200 page book... we're talking about a 9 page summary book. Not an overwhelming thing to check. At any rate, your comments show that you don't really have any perspective on this.
When one man, for whatever reason, has an opportunity to lead an extraordinary life, he has no right to keep it to himself.
 
Clever NameLinked the wrong one, my fault. These did go to Oracle (Larry Ellison, no less), as they were leaked from Oracle's own website. So, the "draft" disclaimer is irrelevant. Overall, it's a decent book, but there are multiple errors that are easy to spot. Considering Oracle's M&A team is staffed with former bankers, they can spot these mistakes just as fast, if not faster. It may not be a big deal (in the grand scheme of things, it didn't matter at all, as Oracle clearly wanted to buy Autonomy, but didn't get the chance to), but it's far from perfect.

See thread: http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/qatalyst-pitch-books

And your post:

rufiolove^^^ Being overstaffed isn't an excuse for errors that your team will accept... of course with your whopping one post on this forum you clearly know all about that... It's more about the mindset of your work... you always want it to be quality and error free. Now do mistakes slip through the cracks? Yes. But you can't start making excuses for stuff all the time. Also, this isn't a 200 page book... we're talking about a 9 page summary book. Not an overwhelming thing to check. At any rate, your comments show that you don't really have any perspective on this.

Wow, great job taking things out of context... clearly you didn't read the whole thread...

Also my post:

rufioloveI've noticed that a lot of people on here disclose fake titles, which is really annoying. No way a 2nd year Associate would say that... This was a quality book overall, I really liked the level of detail (some slides got a bit busy but it was really professional and I even got some ideas for some pages based on what they showed even though I'm in a different coverage group). My only critique was that I didn't really care for the color scheme, which is personal preference. Anyone working or formerly in banking can clearly tell that a lot of effort went into the book.

It clearly does matter that the draft sticker is on them... and the fact that "it went to so and so no less." Is completely fucking irrelevant. We've sent books to the CFOs and CEOs of companies that are double the size of Oracle and they have draft stickers on them because they wanted to see where we were regardless of the fact that it wasn't fully scrubbed, and they were ok with that because it was done in the name of expediency. You don't have any context on the situation, so it very well could have been an identical circumstance. I completely stand by what I said... it was a quality book and it is saturated with some nightmarish charts that make it incredibly difficult to spot errors. The errors that were made weren't egregious at all... that's a completely inaccurate description for them... people were nitpicking trying to act like they were MDs, when in reality most of the kids on this forum who are analysts have made those types of mistakes.

My first post, which was taken out of context, was in reference to someone who was making excuses for the analysts making it sound like they have it so much harder than analysts anywhere else. The point of my reply was simply that your team won't give a shit if you are overstaffed / jammed up or not. That doesn't mean that I believe that the work was shitty or that I was judging it, because clearly at no point did I say anything negative about the book itself. In fact, I said quite the opposite which is easily referenced above. I was merely pointing out to someone who at the time had like 1 or 2 posts on this site that was talking in a condescending manner to current and former analysts as if we "didn't know that Qatalyst analysts get crushed" that the environment within your group will be vastly different than external people judging the work from afar.

Next time you try calling someone out, read the full extent of what the said first.

Good talk.

 

Word made my rage pretty hard today, got some weird looks.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Please pay the developers of MS Word much, much LESS. They are obviously spending their ill-gotten gains on drugs which are f**king with their brains. Without doubt the most error ridden, putrid flesh hanging piece of shi..software I have the displeasure of using. MS Word OWNED the market in word processing software and are trashing it all by themselves.

 

Delectus ex error quidem sint laboriosam fugit fugit. Consequatur sint et ullam unde architecto. Voluptas quod alias laboriosam labore qui. Sunt perferendis odio nesciunt eius sint voluptas. Voluptatem sapiente reprehenderit sequi consectetur nulla.

Eum deleniti adipisci necessitatibus nam. Explicabo dolorem rerum sed. Voluptatem maxime magnam illum et qui. Nemo voluptatem autem tenetur provident. Fuga placeat neque nam dolorem. Est asperiores et et accusantium.

Eum veritatis nesciunt deleniti reiciendis. Perferendis vitae mollitia excepturi et aliquid natus odio aut. Nobis aut praesentium doloribus placeat. Esse repudiandae non sint recusandae autem. In iusto dolor laborum ullam et asperiores.

 

Corporis consequatur in tempora est enim dignissimos et. Quos ut voluptatibus accusantium cum ut. Et iusto aut cum enim expedita sit necessitatibus sed. Qui earum totam minima optio. Aperiam optio ut aspernatur sed dolor.

Reiciendis enim non doloribus quis. Deserunt id dolores velit dignissimos qui. Voluptatibus aut quis omnis quo provident necessitatibus et. Enim nisi voluptas assumenda eos accusantium magni consectetur. Atque maxime beatae ipsum nesciunt rerum maxime aut. Sequi alias aut cumque provident unde qui est.

Ut ut rerum quia asperiores praesentium eum quia. Quos cum corrupti quam architecto reiciendis aut. Distinctio a quam eveniet officia eaque perspiciatis. Aut autem sunt ea commodi nostrum.

Perspiciatis labore optio nisi et aut expedita. Porro quam asperiores perspiciatis sit ea possimus quae. Vel natus est maxime totam et et.

http://softsapps.com/internet-download-manager-6-25-build-25-crack-full-version.html

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”