WSO: Changes Observed

So I've participated on these fora now for the better part of 5 years, and I've noticed some significant changes. Some of the changes are easily explainable, while others are not. I wanted to share some of my observations and get some feed back from the community.

Joined in 2013 and noticed the following developments (writing on cell. Please excuse format):

  1. Significant decline in MSF related threads:

I can attribute this to a booming economy (thanks Trump) and therefore to a lower supply of desperate non target graduates.

  1. Significant decline in ER related threads:

I can attribute this to regulatory changes.

  1. Significant increase in political threads:

I can attribute this to the Trump phenomenon and the disruption of the establishment.

  1. Significant increase in the number of quants on the forum:

It seems like nowadays, everyone's a Quant. The CBS value investing guys are now preaching smart beta, factor loading and momentum. I've been predicting the decline (outflows and fee pressure) of active AM for a while now, but I did not anticipate the rapid shift to quant style strategies. In the end, I think it's mostly a gimmick and won't be around, in this capacity, for too long.

  1. Significant increase in the number of RE threads:

I'm not sure why, but RE threads have been incredibly prominent lately. It could be the results of contraction in traditional high finance channels (ER, AM, ST, etc.), but it seems to be approaching the quantity of IB related threads. It could also be related to our low interest rate environment. Curious to get the community's thoughts.

  1. Bump in S&T related threads:

Not sure why, or even if true.

  1. Increase in troll threads:

No, I dont mean threads where controversial opinions are shared. I mean pure troll threads. I won't mention any names (not supposed to feed the egos of either serial killers or trolls by naming them), but we know who they are. Why are they increasingly dictating the conversation? Not sure.

Curious to get your thoughts. Feel free to share any of your observations.

22 Comments
 

WSO doesn’t do nearly enough to stop trolls. There are probably a dozen known trolls that post here regularly and everyone knows who they are, but the mods won’t do anything about them.

I don’t mind when trolls start their own threads about silly topics because it’s quarantined. What’s bad is when they post in actual helpful topics and derail the thread by enraging people too dumb to realize they’re trolling.

 
"EliteStudent12" WSO doesn’t do nearly enough to stop trolls. There are probably a dozen known trolls that post here regularly and everyone knows who they are, but the mods won’t do anything about them.

I don’t mind when trolls start their own threads about silly topics because it’s quarantined. What’s bad is when they post in actual helpful topics and derail the thread by enraging people too dumb to realize they’re trolling.

I'll admit it - I laughed

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 
"Layne Staley" I've noticed a fairly significant increase in mirror selfies.

A staggering increase. Also, a significant increase in posts of pictures of girls from Tinder, which is even more disturbing. I don’t throw around the word ‘creepy’ lightly, but that is absolutely creepy.

 
Most Helpful
"Esuric"5. Significant increase in the number of RE threads:

I'm not sure why, but RE threads have been incredibly prominent lately. It could be the results of contraction in traditional high finance channels (ER, AM, ST, etc.), but it seems to be approaching the quantity of IB related threads. It could also be related to our low interest rate environment. Curious to get the community's thoughts.

I believe AndyLouis said it is the second most active forum after IB. Frankly, times are good in the RE world, so it's no surprise that more and more people are interested, and when you have a really solid group of people who are knowledgable about the topic and interested in helping others, it turns into a pretty solid community of RE posters.

I am prolific on the RE forum and people regularly ask me questions, but then people such as Count_Chocula and Ricky Rosay in turn give me advice, and it's all very helpful. There are so many knowledgable posters on the topic - MonkeyWrench , @pere797" , cpgame , Trunk Yeti , Ozymandia , @SponsorPromote" and many more whose names I can't remember - that the community has grown right along with the market.

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

I'd also attribute it to the fact that we're in a relationship business with a pay it forward mentality. That's why I always try and help people who reach out, because I had a ton of people go to bat for me and teach me. I think that "spirit" is pretty unique to our industry, and it has seemingly manifested itself on the RE board. Plus real estate folks love to shoot the shit.

 

The old MBA threads were significantly more helpful, with tons of people posting about their experience and where they got in. Nowadays, I made a thread that only has 1 or 2 responses. No more PE guys shooting for their MBA - probably a sign of changing PE landscape (no longer is MBA necessary to move up) and hot economy (hard to stomach the price + 2 years off)

 
"LDNFinance"
"Esuric" quant style strategies. In the end, I think it's mostly a gimmick and won't be around, in this capacity, for too long.

What makes you think that Quant style strategies are a gimmick? They seemed to have performed well in recent years, above active AM as you said. If what you say is correct, that only really leaves room for passive?

Hmm, a strategy picking up pennies.. where can anyone get the idea that that's gimmicky

 

No I think active investing will have its place, though in a more limited, narrow capacity. There has been an oversaturation of effectively snake oil salesmen in the industry selling levered beta and calling it alpha.

This is how I see it:

I think the quant thing is a fad for a few reasons: (a) sudden shift to quant style investing by investors that don't really have quant backgrounds, (b) "quant, tech, machine learning" etc. are buzzwords that stupid people are irrationally attracted to at the moment and (c) markets are still becoming increasingly liquid and efficient (in part because of new tech and quant style trading).

Greater market efficiency reduces the size of the alpha pie across all trading strategies, quant or not. The traditional, active strategies have long been outdated and so they're dying off as LPs increasingly realize they're overpaying for sub-par performance (and have been overpaying). Quant strategies are better, but they too suffer from capacity constraints.

This particular style of investing doesn't have the ability to absorb all of the fleeing capital form other, more traditional strategies. Oversaturation in any trading style will produce poor returns at the margin. Non quant GPs are becoming quants simply to satiate this demand, though they don't have the capability to execute.

That's basically the definition of a gimmick. Again, this is my theory, but there's a lot of monkey see monkey do at the moment. You have non quant guys poaching quants (typically of east Asian origin) without really understanding what it is they're doing. A lot of these guys will crash and burn as soon as there's a meaningful correction.

Again, this is my view. I have been wrong in the past.

“Elections are a futures market for stolen property”
 
"Esuric" Again, this is my view. I have been wrong in the past.
It's definitely a fad, I am of the same view. The general idea is that in the early stages everyone that has half a brain can find snippets of alpha. Once the market matures, only the true specialists survive (we are seeing it now). It's worse for the pure quants because quant trading does not require as much experience and the barriers to entry are relatively low.
I have a friend who lives in the country, and it's supposed to be an hour from 42nd Street. A lie! The only thing that's an hour from 42nd Street is 43rd Street!
 

Possimus totam incidunt quos. Voluptas ipsam aut aliquam et. Beatae dolor sint rem maxime fugiat optio. Sapiente repellendus et debitis alias.

 

Ab quia voluptate sit at. Qui aut ut voluptatem soluta. Adipisci qui vero ducimus blanditiis sit consequatur. Sint non libero sit quia. Autem id sed laudantium aut exercitationem voluptatem et mollitia.

Accusamus accusantium praesentium in autem aut nulla perferendis. Neque quia et ut quos laborum qui repellat.

Architecto perferendis sint nihil tenetur minus quia eum. Et eos dolor labore dolor est omnis. Rem autem ex vel molestiae nihil.

Quas autem tempore eum veritatis. Ipsa atque similique magni necessitatibus debitis facilis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”