Accurate of MOIC estimation

Dear all, hi!

It will be great to hear your opinion about this topic. Thank you very much! :) Recently i've discussed with teammates topic about MOIC. Usually it estimates as (Dividends + NAV) / Commited capital.

But what if we agressivley pay lease payaments of our equipment. For example busisness equity 20% and debt (leasing) 80%. In our case all cash flows after expenses go to these lease payments.

1) Should we anyway estimate future return to these initial 20% equity? For example equity 200 th Debt (Lease) 800 th

Dividends 100$ = DVPI => 100th /200 th => 0.5 Net asset Value 200 th/ 200 th = 1

2) Or we should reestimate it taking into account agrgesivley lease payments? For example equity 200 th $ Debt (Lease) 800 th$. => will be in future equity, because of repayments

Dividends 100$ = DVPI => 100th /1000 th => 0.1 NAV changes due to the change of equity, will be 1 till the Net income will be higher and payments will not go to lease payments.

Thank you

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Difficulties understanding your question. Let me rephrase: if I compare a company with owned assets with a company that leases all of its assest, how do I compare MOIC?

Company that owns the assets has to do capex and pay interest on the assets --> lease payments should not be significantly higher than these 2. These cash-outs also reduce ability to pay dividends.

In general, the way you finance your assets should not matter (much) for your valuation if you use a target leverage instead of current leverage. Value is in your ability to create operational profits with certain assets. The way you currently finance those assets should not have an impact in DCF and marginally in LBO.

 

Suscipit dolorum ut quo quis. Voluptate ipsam doloremque aut dolor. Ipsam eius eos eum aspernatur qui doloribus. Omnis nihil aperiam est expedita ut.

Aspernatur quis molestiae adipisci ipsam. Quia quia quaerat similique recusandae saepe. Ullam sint eos excepturi qui quis. Accusantium quis earum exercitationem repellat vitae ab velit velit.

Est dicta exercitationem laudantium sequi. Et consequatur dolores soluta quam excepturi eos. Ullam inventore aspernatur eum atque et quidem voluptatem. Ab rerum et sed numquam. Et dolorum dignissimos qui et fugit. In fuga sit quia fugiat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.2%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (236) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (40) $79
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”