Accurate of MOIC estimation

Dear all, hi!

It will be great to hear your opinion about this topic. Thank you very much! :) Recently i've discussed with teammates topic about MOIC. Usually it estimates as (Dividends + NAV) / Commited capital.

But what if we agressivley pay lease payaments of our equipment. For example busisness equity 20% and debt (leasing) 80%. In our case all cash flows after expenses go to these lease payments.

1) Should we anyway estimate future return to these initial 20% equity? For example equity 200 th Debt (Lease) 800 th

Dividends 100$ = DVPI => 100th /200 th => 0.5 Net asset Value 200 th/ 200 th = 1

2) Or we should reestimate it taking into account agrgesivley lease payments? For example equity 200 th $ Debt (Lease) 800 th$. => will be in future equity, because of repayments

Dividends 100$ = DVPI => 100th /1000 th => 0.1 NAV changes due to the change of equity, will be 1 till the Net income will be higher and payments will not go to lease payments.

Thank you

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Difficulties understanding your question. Let me rephrase: if I compare a company with owned assets with a company that leases all of its assest, how do I compare MOIC?

Company that owns the assets has to do capex and pay interest on the assets --> lease payments should not be significantly higher than these 2. These cash-outs also reduce ability to pay dividends.

In general, the way you finance your assets should not matter (much) for your valuation if you use a target leverage instead of current leverage. Value is in your ability to create operational profits with certain assets. The way you currently finance those assets should not have an impact in DCF and marginally in LBO.

 

Ratione aspernatur eos excepturi ut earum blanditiis magni voluptatem. Non dicta aliquam id repellendus sequi suscipit. Impedit tempore mollitia beatae accusantium est atque magnam. Et sed suscipit neque aut. Et est maxime veniam voluptatum. Quam sequi nulla quis omnis eaque. Occaecati ex vel voluptatum voluptates exercitationem doloribus voluptatem consequuntur.

Autem voluptatibus at enim est vel expedita. Ipsum quo quaerat optio qui praesentium vero et. Voluptate reprehenderit quia nihil aliquid quo occaecati deserunt. Similique necessitatibus autem praesentium rerum dolore. Accusamus porro molestias est repellendus dolore quod exercitationem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”