Good Performing Software Funds

Has anyone seen any buyout software funds actually performing well recently? Vista, SL, Blackstone, Insight, Clearlake, etc. all seem to have rough recent vintages. Even MM software funds or the true value guys have pretty rough looking returns.

Software PE just feels structurally difficult right now. Firms still need to deploy huge amounts of capital but there are very few, if any, scaled software businesses with real AI tailwinds that are both attractive and reasonably priced. It feels like firms are either buying lower quality “misunderstood” assets or companies facing real AI disruption risk.

Then you add leverage, 5-7 year hold periods, and a market that’s actively compressing software moats and margins through AI. Hard to see how the next buyer pays anything close to what PE firms will underwrite unless they get lucky with an AI tailwind company at a cheap price.

For people in software PE or considering the switch, how are you thinking about this market? Does it make more sense to move toward VC or publics and invest in the disruptors instead?

5 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, the software private equity (PE) space is indeed facing structural challenges right now. Here's a breakdown of the key issues and considerations:

  1. Performance Struggles Across Major Players:

    • Prominent software-focused buyout funds like Vista, Silver Lake, Blackstone, Insight, and Clearlake have reportedly had rough recent vintages. This reflects broader difficulties in the sector rather than isolated underperformance.
  2. Structural Challenges in Software PE:

    • Capital Deployment Pressure: Firms need to deploy significant capital, but there’s a scarcity of scaled software businesses with genuine AI tailwinds that are both attractive and reasonably priced.
    • AI Disruption Risk: Many software companies face risks from AI-driven disruption, which compresses traditional software moats and margins.
    • Leverage and Exit Risks: The typical PE model of using leverage and holding assets for 5-7 years becomes riskier in a market where future buyers may not pay the same multiples, especially without clear AI-driven growth stories.
  3. Shift in Investment Focus:

    • Some professionals in software PE are considering a pivot toward venture capital (VC) or public markets. VC offers exposure to disruptors and earlier-stage companies driving AI innovation, while public markets provide liquidity and access to established players adapting to AI trends.
  4. Current Strategies in Software PE:

    • Targeting Misunderstood Assets: Some firms are focusing on lower-quality or "misunderstood" assets, though this comes with higher risk.
    • Operational Improvements: PE firms may look to improve operational efficiency in acquired companies to drive returns, but this strategy is increasingly challenging in a competitive and evolving market.

For those in software PE or considering a switch, it’s crucial to weigh the risks of staying in a structurally difficult market against the opportunities in VC or public markets. The decision will depend on your risk tolerance, career goals, and interest in earlier-stage innovation versus more stable, transaction-oriented roles.

Sources: Public Perception of Private Equity: A Discussion, Which investing strategy will be most challenged this decade (‘20 through ‘29)?, Does it make sense to go from software CD->traditional PE if my end goal is software PE?, PE recruiting technical questions (software specific), A Guide on How to Navigate On-Cycle PE Recruiting

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

It’s what the guy said above about the multiple compression. Relatedly at this stage, the antagonism towards the sector means that even if you are very convinced that you own a top quality software asset, you would be dumb to sell or mark to market at today’s valuation if you own a top asset.

Unfortunately software as a whole has become very unattractive, which means everyone needs to wait for a few years before it’s clear what is a good asset and what isn’t. The good assets, however, will still be highly valuable (or even more valuable) in the future.

 

Coming from a software operator side, I’d like to point out that software is not attractive anymore primarily because writing code is not the bottleneck anymore. But the true moat is data, regulation, brand & proprietary distribution, and results. The industry has been moving to outcome-based pricing for a while, but now we expect it. This means that instead of a software company providing you with tools (which, if you think about it, still makes you do all the work yourself), we’re now expecting they’ll provide us with the end result.

 

Exercitationem vel perferendis consequatur id exercitationem. Sit numquam illo ut doloremque ut praesentium. Nihil magni cumque omnis iste sunt ea. Quaerat molestiae expedita ratione hic esse voluptatem. Optio rem debitis illo qui iusto suscipit ut. Temporibus perspiciatis aut nihil esse hic perspiciatis aperiam.

Dolorum dolor est labore qui et sed omnis. Mollitia quaerat aspernatur sunt ea vel ea delectus. Vero in totam pariatur qui rem corporis. Tempora accusantium et sint ut. Aperiam aut quia qui quam voluptas culpa. Quo aut earum distinctio unde nihil.

Iusto impedit ipsa eligendi et aut illo dolores. Qui ea eum cupiditate aut.

Itaque voluptates dignissimos ducimus rem laborum. Voluptates odit reiciendis voluptates soluta ex. Corporis incidunt quibusdam earum perferendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”