Question is in the title. I've been incredible fortunate to have received two offers (Cantor Fitzgerald IB in NYC Healthcare and Brown Brothers Harriman in their PE arm). I was wondering what people believe to be the better choice. For context, BBH comp is slightly higher for SA and the MD explicitly told me I should expect to work 55-60 hrs/wk instead of 80, wheras Cantor says to expect to work ~80 hrs/wk. Here are my initial thoughts:
Cantor: Better analyst program (standard IB training, more peers my age), Better exits into HC-related areas, BBH FT comp is likely to be lower, Better lateral potential into IB?
BBH: Slightly higher pay and better WLB, Better staying potential/lateral potential to PE?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +118 | Future of PE | 27 | 9h |
| +26 | Hardest time I have ever seen to be a GP | 3 | 4d |
| +20 | How to Get on Career Track / Stay Post ASO years | 6 | 3d |
| +14 | KKR comp for Principal | 20 | 2d |
| +12 | MBA and Private Equity | 5 | 1d |
| +10 | Undergrad summer PE analyst positions | 3 | 9h |
| +9 | Buyside in London with nice WLB and pay | 1 | 12h |
| +9 | 2028 Oncycle PE | 10 | 6h |
| +9 | LMM/MM PE London | 5 | 3d |
| +8 | Lindsay Goldberg FT 27 | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
Minus asperiores numquam placeat et quia iste accusamus expedita. Sit ut consequuntur totam earum rerum veritatis. Quia cupiditate unde et earum. Placeat aliquid doloremque dolorum dolorum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...