CF in DCF vs LBO

What is the difference between the DCF and the LBO in the cash flow calculation? With the DCF, you calculate the FCFF and assume that the company is fully financed by equity. What cash flow is calculated for the LBO?

6 Comments
 

You should take a course or something / watch YouTube / ask juniors and seniors at school

LBO uses cash available for debt service (CFADS) and pays mandatory amortization and other fixed obligations then sweeps cash into revolver and repayable debt, usually the first lien term loan B.

The key difference between a DCF’s FCF is the impact of interest expense (and the tax impact)

 
Most Helpful

I'd second the comment about taking a course - the mechanical difference between the cash flows are relatively simple, but what is more important is that you understand the difference between these methods, what they mean, and when you'd use them (which is a lot of explaining). The big picture answer is that the cash flows in a DCF are the cash flows available to all asset owners of the firm, while in an LBO model the resulting cash flows are those available to equity-holders after satisfying debt obligations. Even this though is a big simpification. 

 

It’s a bit more nuanced but simply put yes, an unlevered DCF shows all cash flows and the LBO shows cash flows on a levered basis, taking into account interest expense and the subsequent tax impact.

When you say satisfying the claims of the investors, what you really mean to say is servicing their outstanding debt obligations to lenders.

 

Bit of a misleading explanation since you can also perform a DCF on a levered FCF basis, which is the same as an LBO (assuming you make new assumptions about debt on a go-forward basis, similar to how an LBO wipes out cap structure at the beginning). Also, levered FCF basis DCF also includes tax impact, just not interest impact since it's debt-neutral (i.e. ignores debt impact), but recognizes tax impact on everything else.

Additionally, a DCF based on FCFF isn't "without taking" capital structure into account, but rather taking all of the capital structure into account (maybe nitpicky semantics, but wanted to include). 

 

Aperiam est vitae commodi voluptatem aut labore dignissimos. Sunt occaecati voluptatem ut quas unde.

Facilis tempore et et voluptatem voluptatem. Molestiae fugiat dolorum error rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”