Charlesbank vs Berkshire 2023
Looking at these two firms as strong UMM players in the Boston area. Anyone have recent takes on either firms / fund performance / comp / progression opportunity? Thanks!
Looking at these two firms as strong UMM players in the Boston area. Anyone have recent takes on either firms / fund performance / comp / progression opportunity? Thanks!
| +86 | Nothing to do at work & bored to hell | 9 | 13m |
| +67 | Do people over-index on 'moats' | 20 | 22h |
| +51 | Predicted Net Worth in Trodden Finance Path by 60? | 20 | 17m |
| +42 | Biggest (avoidable) failures in PE Investments? | 23 | 1d |
| +38 | Why is ROIC never really a topic when looking at companies IRL | 11 | 3d |
| +26 | SGE Final Round (Investment Summer Analyst) - Case Study & Technicals? | 13 | 6d |
| +19 | Senior IR Lifestyle | 3 | 5d |
| +12 | How to approach Buyside Recruiting | 3 | 4d |
| +12 | NY LMM PE Recruiting | 3 | 18h |
| +12 | Honest opinions needed about lateraling | 4 | 1d |
Career Resources
Bump
Pretty obvious choice here is Berkshire, CB not in the same league
Can you elaborate?
Charlesbank puts the mid in UMM
Eh, have to disagree with that poster. Berkshire might have historical “prestige” but they’ve struggled to raise funds recently. CB’s fund size has only gone up over the last 20 years and they’ve been doing well recently + are growing. It’s more of a bet on the past vs. future IMO
This logic would point to *always* picking the smaller fund absent truly catastrophic events, fund size dropping, etc.
OP, I have no clue about CB returns, whether fund XI was in the market / how attractive it was, and there may be great reasons to pick it over Berkshire. But extrapolating too much from fundraising processes and their target-hitting in the COVID era is not as simple as "past vs. future" imo without greather context.
That’s fair, I could have been more rigorous. I don’t think it’s a given that all funds are destined to grow, though - plenty of small funds stay small. My general sense is that CB has a better future trajectory though.
Both good firms. Even with solid recent raise, think CB is a half step below Berkshire. Berkshire still slightly bigger, still seems to invest in slightly more interesting companies and partnership deals (totally subjective but just my POV), and still has more success getting associates to the right next steps (b-school or otherwise). Also, this is maybe a dated view by 1-2 years, but CB is notorious for being a really tough place to work ... porting over the whole tech team from another fund wasn't exactly seamless, had some turnover at mid/senior levels even aside from that, and associates get worked to the bone. All that said, agree it will be super interesting to see how the next 1-2 fundraises go for each firm.
What about other UMM Boston funds (thl, baypine)
I would suggest Berkshire. Yes the last fund was a bit of a struggle to raise but they have a pretty good long term track record. Good culture, people there have strong pedigrees, and you will get good training.
Charlesbank has a good fund trajectory but returns across recent funds seem a bit spotty. Also as the previous poster mentioned the culture can be a bit more intense (especially the ex Pamplona guys)
The guys with the best returns (CB tech fund) across both groups are too intense for you? Give me a break.
Maybe you have more first hand experience than me, but the last few main funds seem to be all 4th or 3rd quartile. The tech fund has had a good run but a lot of the returns are concentrated in 1-2 lucky wins (one starts with D and TBD on whether anyone actually pays a reasonable price given the supplier concentration on that one)
Think overall fund performance for Charlesbank is still solid - a few bad apples though. Agree lifestyle can be tough, but think people are generally nice.
Anybody who the HH for both are?
Both are very solid firms- and moreover with a very similar ethos / character in my personal opinion and based on my limited experiences working with both firms: both Boston firms; smart individuals with heavier consultant vs. banking backgrounds; focused on buying high quality businesses and partnering with management teams to drive growth (vs. distressed deals, etc.); focused on upper mid market deals (Berkshire deals on average might be slightly larger but only very marginally if at all).
As others have pointed out, yes, Berkshire is the older (potentially more storied) firm of the two. Berkshire has also consistently sent their associates to HBS, GSB, Wharton year after year (though can say the same about Charlesbank to a large extent, too). And at the same time, also seems true (based on what I have heard through the grapevines) that Berkshire’s more recent funds have underperformed and that they have struggled with fundraising as a result.
All of that is to say, both are very good firms. Assuming you have received offers from both (or even one of them), congratulations- you have the potential for a very promising career in PE at either firm.
friends headed/at both -- so not firsthand, take my POV with a grain of salt. both great brands, BP seems to be past its prime... CB potentially on the up ( though it's difficult for any PE to scale nowadays). BP's less focused on value investing... focused more on "quality" which led to them paying some pretty enormous multiples in this fund as well as the last according to friends. Hard to see how LPs will appreciate a fund making similar mistakes twice over. Brand matters, but only for so long if returns continue to be sub-par, all this to say eventually suboptimal performance will catch up with brand. CB writes smaller checks, have heard it's a little sweatier but tend to deploy a little bit more carefully from what I hear. CB hired rapidly over COVID so will be interesting to see how promotion funnel expands (or not). Definitely can't go wrong with either, but would definitely spend more time understanding BP's returns / why etc.
Have heard similar about Berkshire going downhill.
Fugiat ut alias eaque dolore. Dicta accusantium veniam doloremque.
Temporibus natus sunt fugiat quidem distinctio dicta asperiores dolore. Saepe quidem autem ullam sint sequi ut quia quis. Maiores sed et commodi dolores quod beatae. Molestias et doloremque quibusdam quia aperiam omnis. At facere quia beatae quia enim. Aliquam quaerat eius modi nihil aperiam.
Rerum vel fuga eius animi. Asperiores veritatis laborum itaque sapiente dolor. Asperiores itaque sapiente similique omnis culpa voluptas. Optio ipsum at explicabo iure sit qui dolor. At quia earum autem earum consectetur distinctio cumque. Est occaecati aspernatur quia inventore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...