19 Comments
 

This logic would point to *always* picking the smaller fund absent truly catastrophic events, fund size dropping, etc.

OP, I have no clue about CB returns, whether fund XI was in the market / how attractive it was, and there may be great reasons to pick it over Berkshire. But extrapolating too much from fundraising processes and their target-hitting in the COVID era is not as simple as "past vs. future" imo without greather context.

 

Both good firms. Even with solid recent raise, think CB is a half step below Berkshire. Berkshire still slightly bigger, still seems to invest in slightly more interesting companies and partnership deals (totally subjective but just my POV), and still has more success getting associates to the right next steps (b-school or otherwise). Also, this is maybe a dated view by 1-2 years, but CB is notorious for being a really tough place to work ... porting over the whole tech team from another fund wasn't exactly seamless, had some turnover at mid/senior levels even aside from that, and associates get worked to the bone. All that said, agree it will be super interesting to see how the next 1-2 fundraises go for each firm. 

 

I would suggest Berkshire. Yes the last fund was a bit of a struggle to raise but they have a pretty good long term track record. Good culture, people there have strong pedigrees, and you will get good training.

Charlesbank has a good fund trajectory but returns across recent funds seem a bit spotty. Also as the previous poster mentioned the culture can be a bit more intense (especially the ex Pamplona guys)

 

The guys with the best returns (CB tech fund) across both groups are too intense for you? Give me a break. 

 
Most Helpful

Both are very solid firms- and moreover with a very similar ethos / character in my personal opinion and based on my limited experiences working with both firms: both Boston firms; smart individuals with heavier consultant vs. banking backgrounds; focused on buying high quality businesses and partnering with management teams to drive growth (vs. distressed deals, etc.); focused on upper mid market deals (Berkshire deals on average might be slightly larger but only very marginally if at all).

As others have pointed out, yes, Berkshire is the older (potentially more storied) firm of the two. Berkshire has also consistently sent their associates to HBS, GSB, Wharton year after year (though can say the same about Charlesbank to a large extent, too). And at the same time, also seems true (based on what I have heard through the grapevines) that Berkshire’s more recent funds have underperformed and that they have struggled with fundraising as a result.

All of that is to say, both are very good firms. Assuming you have received offers from both (or even one of them), congratulations- you have the potential for a very promising career in PE at either firm.

 

friends headed/at both -- so not firsthand, take my POV with a grain of salt. both great brands, BP seems to be past its prime... CB potentially on the up ( though it's difficult for any PE to scale nowadays). BP's less focused on value investing... focused more on "quality" which led to them paying some pretty enormous multiples in this fund as well as the last according to friends. Hard to see how LPs will appreciate a fund making similar mistakes twice over. Brand matters, but only for so long if returns continue to be sub-par, all this to say eventually suboptimal performance will catch up with brand. CB writes smaller checks, have heard it's a little sweatier but tend to deploy a little bit more carefully from what I hear. CB hired rapidly over COVID so will be interesting to see how promotion funnel expands (or not). Definitely can't go wrong with either, but would definitely spend more time understanding BP's returns / why etc.

 

Nihil illum omnis et praesentium aliquid est eum. Recusandae explicabo ducimus voluptates. Nihil in consectetur distinctio natus velit nihil eaque. Est aut quis rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”