Comp Decreasing?
……………………………. ……………………………. ……………………………. ……………………………. ……………………………. ……………………………. ……………………………. ……………………………. ……………………………. …………………………….
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +24 | Negotiating title for VP role? | 11 | 2h |
| +22 | How to explain short stint on resume | 3 | 15h |
| +18 | VP Promotion Chances at Megafund | 16 | 3d |
| +17 | BX / KKR Evergreen PE vs GS/EVR IB → Top MF PE | 8 | 1d |
| +17 | Being honest in Interviews? | 1 | 2d |
| +16 | Contracted Revenue vs. Recurring Revenue - How Do You Underwrite It? | 4 | 2d |
| +16 | Managers Starting Independent Sponsor Vehicles | 3 | 5d |
| +14 | Choose UMM PE or AI Corpdev role | 4 | 1d |
| +14 | Does founder experience help or hurt in buyside recruiting? | 6 | 2d |
| +13 | Headhunter Etiquette | 4 | 2d |
Career Resources
Wouldn’t surprise me if this is partly a public GP phenomenon. Once shareholders enter the picture, there’s often more pressure to standardize comp and protect margins, even if fund performance remains strong.
Yes industry matures what did you expecg
Well this is not the trend I see at other MFs… Private GPs always paid more, one can accept being $100k below those levels which would be ~$550k, but a decreasing comp to these levels is unheard of (I think). Also $475-500k ($75k of it in illiquid RSUs) for VP1 would be quite uncompetitive, would be similar or lower than a Brookfield
Pretty sure I know which fund this is. I worked there myself but recently left to another MF.
Had friends who worked in RE (original one). Situation with RE in this fund specifically is you have one of the acquisitions that have a very similar strategy and they were comped lower...now how can that be the case given we are all one company? Perk reduction linked to that as well.
This impacts RE. So far, did not impact other teams. Also note that from this year onwards there were other specific comp changes made.
Feel free to PM if you want to chat further.
Just name the fund.
It's definitely a mix of being public and having to standardize comp + decreases in performance increasing cost pressure. Going public for a MF is about making the GP owners rich, not creating a better environment for the median/entry-level IPs.
I've been saying this for a while now. PE, and particularly REPE, is dying. Real estate is a mature industry and has fully recovered from the GFC and covid. Funds are being consolidated left and right with upwards pressure on returns, but downwards pressure on comp. Unique strategies such as private credit and small bay industrial have been commoditized by emerging funds, leaving little room left for creativity. Why should your company pay you $550k-$600k when they can pay someone who just got laid off much less?
I'm in CRE lending and it's incredibly competitive for financing opportunities bc there is so much money out there which compresses margins and fees. This will lead to lower comp.
i’m very late stage with a MF right now after being in MM for a long time. would love to hear from you on this further and trade notes if you want to PM me.
Praesentium nihil perferendis aliquid quia autem saepe aut consequatur. Numquam eum maiores odit voluptatem. Dolorum enim magni optio omnis.
Voluptatum mollitia consequatur et distinctio nihil. Est in occaecati ea qui architecto est corrupti. Dolor est sequi eaque quas. Veniam non quis ipsa recusandae. Eveniet nam vel velit rem rerum earum incidunt. Est quaerat voluptatem dolores temporibus odio distinctio.
Non qui quis dignissimos. Tempora culpa sit est. Necessitatibus id exercitationem et natus iste dolore qui omnis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...