Deal sourcing attribution

How is this determined at your fund? Does it need to be proprietary, bilateral, or limited auction, or just part of a screen where someone did a lot of work before hand and so came in as a differentiated party or what? Any stories on this topic?

4 Comments
 

Deal sourcing attribution can vary significantly depending on the fund's structure, culture, and processes. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some insights into how deal sourcing attribution is typically determined:

  1. Proprietary vs. Auction Deals:

    • Proprietary deals (off-market or bilateral) are often the gold standard for sourcing attribution. These are deals where the individual or team directly cultivated the opportunity, often through relationships, cold outreach, or unique insights.
    • Limited auction deals can also count, especially if the individual brought a differentiated angle or insight that made the fund a standout bidder.
  2. Level of Involvement:

    • Attribution often depends on how much work the individual did to bring the deal to the table. For example, if someone identified the opportunity through a screen, conducted initial diligence, and pitched it internally, they are more likely to receive credit.
    • Conversely, if the deal came through a banker or another intermediary, attribution might be shared or less emphasized unless the individual added significant value.
  3. Internal Processes:

    • Some funds have formal tracking systems where every deal is logged, and the originator is noted. This helps in determining attribution during performance reviews or bonus discussions.
    • Others rely on informal recognition, where senior team members acknowledge contributions during deal team meetings or post-deal reviews.
  4. Stories from WSO Threads:

    • A recurring theme is the importance of proprietary deal flow. Many funds reward individuals who can source off-market deals, as these are less competitive and often more lucrative.
    • One user shared that their fund attributed deals based on the "first touch" rule—whoever initiated contact with the target company or intermediary got credit, even if others later contributed to the process.
    • Another story highlighted the value of being a "differentiated party" in an auction. For example, one associate received credit for a deal because they had built a relationship with the target's management team months before the process began, giving their fund an edge.

Key Takeaways:

  • Proprietary and bilateral deals are highly valued for attribution.
  • Significant involvement in screening, diligence, or relationship-building can earn credit, even in auction processes.
  • Funds often have unique attribution systems, so understanding your firm's criteria is crucial.

If you're looking to stand out, focus on building relationships, identifying unique opportunities, and adding value early in the process.

Sources: HF to PE post-MBA - my story and seeking advice (long-time poster)!, Why the hate towards growth PE / sourcing (e.g. KKR Tech)?, Learning Curve as 2nd Year Analyst, Corp Dev / Strategy Role - No Deal Flow?, The rise of business development roles in the industry

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

At my fund, there is a so called deal attribution record aka DAR where they write down all the team members and what they contributed. It's split into sourcing, conversion, execution, portfolio and exit (iirc). Then team members are rated as critical (without the work, it wouldn't have happened), significant contributor, and contributor to each of these. Most juniors are contributors, and principal level or above are either critical or significant contributors. There's more complicated formulas behind how carry is allocated at the fund level which I don't know veyr well. 

 

VP in PE - LBOs

At my fund, there is a so called deal attribution record aka DAR where they write down all the team members and what they contributed. It's split into sourcing, conversion, execution, portfolio and exit (iirc). Then team members are rated as critical (without the work, it wouldn't have happened), significant contributor, and contributor to each of these. Most juniors are contributors, and principal level or above are either critical or significant contributors. There's more complicated formulas behind how carry is allocated at the fund level which I don't know veyr well. 

Do you guys have any formal views around what’s considered critical vs not? At some firms whoever had the first touch point and brought on the radar something that otherwise wouldn’t be is automatically a critical sourcing even if it ends up being a process

 

Atque recusandae rerum quis ipsum magnam. Sequi sit incidunt perferendis facere. Aperiam velit dolor exercitationem neque accusamus voluptatem est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”