Effect of # of shareholders on attractiveness of PE investment

From the perspective of a LMM sponsor: let’s say there are two companies, A and B. A is 100% owned by a single shareholder; B is owned 90% by one shareholder and 10% by a different, completely passive shareholder. How differently Will these two companies be viewed by potential investors? I’m guessing dealing with a single owner would be easier, but is that to the extent that PE firms will always prefer single ownership? Or do they not really care?

Additionally, how much weight would investors give to the valuation at which the minority stake was sold, particularly if it was at in the near past?

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

It is clearly a case by case issue, however I believe the sponsor would generally be indifferent between the existing equity ownership structure based on # shareholders.

From a logistics perspective, if the major shareholder is interested in a transaction, they will more likely than not encourage the minority equity investors to engage with the potential acquirer.

Having a single shareholder has its benefits from a logistic POV however also has limitations in that any equity investment in the business must go through that shareholder.

Conversely, if there is a 51% majority holder who is sceptical about the deal, a number of accepting minority shareholders may encourage the majority shareholder to sell into the offer as well (thereby assist the sponsor in this example).

Equally, if there are no majority shareholders (and instead a small number of minority but controlling shareholders i.e. 5 @ 20% each), the sponsor may find this attractive as they can procure majority ownership without getting approval from all parties.

___

With respect to valuation, I think investors would use the implied 100% equity valuation as a legitimate benchmark if the minority stake is >10-15%. A recent example would be GA's 20% stake in U.K. based Gymshark.  

 

In minus consequuntur consequuntur dignissimos. Ea a eos non occaecati alias possimus. Nam laborum totam aut temporibus ipsa soluta. Voluptatibus illum architecto saepe et non dolor dicta ipsam.

Sed dolor cum ut quis cumque veniam qui. Ut qui hic corporis nihil et reprehenderit adipisci. Ea ut facere totam culpa officia et. Quos temporibus nemo ad. Iusto aut amet est quidem suscipit.

charts
Better Odds of Getting Into Private Equity With WSO
We help you land the role or you get free tuition.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (105) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (412) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”