Goldman vs Lazard / Evercore Exits
Does anyone have insights into how these firms exit specifically for healthcare coverage groups
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
Career Resources
Generally: evercore, Goldman, Lazard. Honestly a lot of this is just due to evercore having a disproportionate amount of their analysts from top schools with top grades who are finance hardos.
If you went to Harvard, had a 4.0, and were obsessed with finance, you’re going to have a similar enough outcome from all three firms. And a kid from Rutgers with a 3.5 at a better firm won’t necessarily do better than you.
I understand GS has cracked down a lot on PE recruiting and many funds are hesitant to interview GS analysts out of fear of damaging the relationship.
With regard to the other two: I would say about equal. HC is a strong group at Laz while at EVR it’s still strong but generally not seen in the same light as media/comms/tech
Past two cycles at Laz HC there’s been an Apollo Flagship, 2x KKR, Marathon (distressed) a few SM hedge fund exits (group takes 4/5 analysts in each class) while EVR has had a KKR, 2x TPG, 2x GA, Altas and a lot of A2As (group is much larger, like 8/9 analysts in each class).
Healthcare used to be one of the strongest groups in Lazard. Deal flow has slowed down but exits are still strong
You should check their deals this year - strong deal flow particularly in biopharma.
Evercore to Moelis & Company segway pipeline snakebite effect disguised into the blue team but it's BMO capital markets (toronto office)
Et quos perferendis in ab. Vel voluptatem facere harum ipsa. Recusandae dolor minus et consequatur nemo et nisi. Est quo perspiciatis mollitia sed omnis. Enim optio assumenda temporibus at cupiditate sunt rerum.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...