Group Led by K.K.R. to Buy Samson for $7.2 Billion in Largest LBO of Year

A consortium led by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts agreed on Wednesday to buy the Samson Investment Company, one of the largest privately held energy companies in the country, for about $7.2 billion. It would be one of the biggest leveraged buyouts since the financial crisis.

Under the terms of the deal, K.K.R. and its partners will buy all Samson assets except the company’s onshore Gulf Coast and offshore deep-water Gulf of Mexico facilities. Those will continue to be owned by Samson’s founding Schusterman family, which is still based in Tulsa, Okla.

K.K.R. is teaming up with an eclectic group: Itochu, a Japanese conglomerate, and two other private equity firms, Natural Gas Partners and Crestview Partners.

The deal is the biggest leveraged buyout of the year, topping the $5.7 billion takeover of Kinetic Partners by Apax Partners. K.K.R. itself claimed one of the biggest leveraged deals of 2010 — the $5.3 billion acquisition of Del Monte Foods.

Article on Dealbook below:
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/k-k-r-led-…

 

Interesting story. I am curios as to how KKR goes about putting a deal like this together, since what I gather on this website they don't really have many energy bankers. I say that because people always talk about energy banking / energy PE as pigeon holing people and disqualifies them from mega firms like KKR.

So do you think KKR just provided the money and teamed up with a firm like Natural gas partners who provided all the expertise & grunt work? Or how does that work for a mega fund like KKR who many say look down on energy bankers, etc.??

 

[quote=frank_reynolds]kkr has an energy team and is currently raising an energy fund that already has $1B+ commitments. they likely just brought in co-investors because the equity required for this deal is massive

plenty of experience in the space. ex: http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/06/01/k-k-r-venture-sells-shale-assets…]

Their energy fund is led by some absolute bosses from the E&P sector (Founding principal sits on board of Encana, was co-president of Jefferies Randall & Dewey, a practice she sold to Jefferies, prior to that was a CEO succession candidate at Texaco). Other notables include the other co-head of J R & D, who was an SVP at El Paso, and a member with 30+ years at Chevron. These guys know what they are doing... East Resources - they absolutely murdered it on that investment.

 

What kind of terms do you guys think KKR offers to investors for co-invest in this transaction. Presumably they'd need to go back to the Fund's LPs and offer them a pro-rata stake in the investment at terms similar to the Fund's terms (i.e. 2 + 20 or whatever)... but my feeling is that in reality the LPs tend to get a lot better terms on the co-investment deals (i.e. 1 + 10 or perhaps no management fee at all and a 15-20% promote)... what have you guys seen in your experience? Maybe KKR is a strong enough player they can actually get 2/20 on coinvest... but I know that mere mortals usually have to give good deals on these investments (as a bonus to loyal LPs who invest in funds hoping for better terms on co-invests, etc.)

 
International Pymp:
What kind of terms do you guys think KKR offers to investors for co-invest in this transaction. Presumably they'd need to go back to the Fund's LPs and offer them a pro-rata stake in the investment at terms similar to the Fund's terms (i.e. 2 + 20 or whatever)... but my feeling is that in reality the LPs tend to get a lot better terms on the co-investment deals (i.e. 1 + 10 or perhaps no management fee at all and a 15-20% promote)... what have you guys seen in your experience? Maybe KKR is a strong enough player they can actually get 2/20 on coinvest... but I know that mere mortals usually have to give good deals on these investments (as a bonus to loyal LPs who invest in funds hoping for better terms on co-invests, etc.)
Most co-invests don't pay normal fees, frequently anchor/sponsor investors will pay zero fees and other investors will always pay reduced and frequently will not pay any. The LPA will outline the GPs co-invest policy and most investors will have maximum co-invest terms written into any sideletters.

As a point of reference, of the past 4 co-invests I have done, I have paid no fees at all on three of them and 12% carry on the last (which was highly oversubscribed due to incredibly low valuation).

As to the deal, looks like there is 60% equity which is probably demonstrative of how the buyout industry is going

 
samoanboy:
As to the deal, looks like there is 60% equity which is probably demonstrative of how the buyout industry is going

I wonder if that's partially a function of the target's industry rather than the general trend in PE. I don't doubt that you'll see less leverage in general, but 60% is a pretty big equity check compared to some other recent deals, even the mega-deals year-to-date (Kinetic Concepts was

There have been many great comebacks throughout history. Jesus was dead but then came back as an all-powerful God-Zombie.
 
Kenny_Powers_CFA][quote=samoanboy:
As to the deal, looks like there is 60% equity which is probably demonstrative of how the buyout industry is going

I wonder if that's partially a function of the target's industry rather than the general trend in PE. I don't doubt that you'll see less leverage in general, but 60% is a pretty big equity check compared to some other recent deals, even the mega-deals year-to-date (Kinetic Concepts was

 
Best Response
samoanboy][quote=Kenny_Powers_CFA][quote=samoanboy:
As to the deal, looks like there is 60% equity which is probably demonstrative of how the buyout industry is going

I wonder if that's partially a function of the target's industry rather than the general trend in PE. I don't doubt that you'll see less leverage in general, but 60% is a pretty big equity check compared to some other recent deals, even the mega-deals year-to-date (Kinetic Concepts was

There have been many great comebacks throughout history. Jesus was dead but then came back as an all-powerful God-Zombie.
 
samoanboy][quote=International Pymp:
What kind of terms do you guys think KKR offers to investors for co-invest in this transaction. Presumably they'd need to go back to the Fund's LPs and offer them a pro-rata stake in the investment at terms similar to the Fund's terms (i.e. 2 + 20 or whatever)... but my feeling is that in reality the LPs tend to get a lot better terms on the co-investment deals (i.e. 1 + 10 or perhaps no management fee at all and a 15-20% promote)... what have you guys seen in your experience? Maybe KKR is a strong enough player they can actually get 2/20 on coinvest... but I know that mere mortals usually have to give good deals on these investments (as a bonus to loyal LPs who invest in funds hoping for better terms on co-invests, etc.)
Most co-invests don't pay normal fees, frequently anchor/sponsor investors will pay zero fees and other investors will always pay reduced and frequently will not pay any. The LPA will outline the GPs co-invest policy and most investors will have maximum co-invest terms written into any sideletters.

As a point of reference, of the past 4 co-invests I have done, I have paid no fees at all on three of them and 12% carry on the last (which was highly oversubscribed due to incredibly low valuation).

thanks, that makes a lot of sense. I guess I'll count my lucky stars that we can sometimes get roughly 1 + 10.

 

Article on the scope of KKR's energy operations:

"The private equity firm K.K.R. has had extraordinary success investing in so-called shale plays. Starting in 2009, the firm has placed three consecutive bets on the business of extracting natural gas from shale rock formations through hydraulic fracturing technology, or fracking."

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/11/25/k-k-r-s-energy-billionaires-club/

There have been many great comebacks throughout history. Jesus was dead but then came back as an all-powerful God-Zombie.
 

Large equity component is probably limited to the amount of debt that would fit into the borrowing base structure based on the value of the reserves. Can't buy and operate an E&P company with mostly debt like a typical LevFin deal. Also, all of the energy focused PE shops do not lever up their investments in fear of a pull back in commodity prices (esp in the E&P space, since borrowing base is revised semi-annually and tied to commodity price....you could theoretically be forced to repay a large chunk of debt in 6-mos if prices collapsed).

My all time favorite PE deal in the E&P space is Kirk Kerkorian's investment in Delta Petroleum (take a look at the historical chart and look back in the '07 days when he began investing).

 
ChemicalBank:
Large equity component is probably limited to the amount of debt that would fit into the borrowing base structure based on the value of the reserves. Can't buy and operate an E&P company with mostly debt like a typical LevFin deal. Also, all of the energy focused PE shops do not lever up their investments in fear of a pull back in commodity prices (esp in the E&P space, since borrowing base is revised semi-annually and tied to commodity price....you could theoretically be forced to repay a large chunk of debt in 6-mos if prices collapsed).

My all time favorite PE deal in the E&P space is Kirk Kerkorian's investment in Delta Petroleum (take a look at the historical chart and look back in the '07 days when he began investing).

Yep, that theory should be applied to all cyclical businesses (not just those exposed directly to commodity markets), but if you look back a few years I think there are plenty of examples of highly leveraged deals in companies with anything but steady earnings!!!
 

Voluptatem voluptatem velit aperiam consequatur repellat non modi. In ut dolorem quo aliquid facilis nostrum fugit. Voluptas omnis incidunt libero qui qui consectetur sint voluptatem.

Praesentium itaque distinctio perspiciatis officiis necessitatibus quaerat. Laborum ut officiis doloribus.

Maiores quae consequatur ut sed. Quas est exercitationem et voluptas. Perferendis architecto voluptate repellendus sed minima ut. Consectetur officiis sunt esse expedita et illo aut. Vel delectus temporibus laudantium.

Quaerat placeat occaecati perspiciatis in aut. Quia voluptate corrupti tempore autem occaecati delectus nulla voluptates. Excepturi veniam libero nobis et voluptatem labore animi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (21) $586
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (89) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (204) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (386) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (313) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”