Girl friend's got a PE Offer - She's a BB associate in Asia with an Asian MBA and about 4 years of experience (she joined as senior analyst post MBA).
Offer is from a global growth PE fund (think Summit/Sequoia and the likes). No carry and total comp is around $250K. She'll probably become principal equivalent in 3 years time when she can get carry etc.
Is that in line with market comp?
| +135 | Future of PE | 29 | 5h |
| +26 | Hardest time I have ever seen to be a GP | 3 | 5d |
| +20 | How to Get on Career Track / Stay Post ASO years | 6 | 4d |
| +18 | Burn Out in PE - What Comes Next? | 3 | 4h |
| +17 | Best industry/job for entrepreneurship? | 3 | 38m |
| +14 | KKR comp for Principal | 20 | 2d |
| +12 | What are you actually using AI for in PE? | 1 | 56m |
| +12 | MBA and Private Equity | 6 | 18h |
| +11 | Buyside in London with nice WLB and pay | 2 | 7h |
| +10 | Undergrad summer PE analyst positions | 3 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
I'm not experienced in growth equity but I have seen lots of people with 4-5 years banking/MBB experience join LBO funds at the Associate level (i.e. pre-MBA). Even some funds recruit bankers/consultants with HBS/Wharton MBAs at the Associate level if they have no PE experience. So all in all, doesn't seem massively surprising that her comp would be equivalent to MF/MM PE Associate level.
However that is based on Eur/US comp, if the position is in Asia, I have heard comp can be a bit lower there, so this may be slightly above pre-mba Associates level for the region.
That comp is in line with a pre-MBA associate at most US LBO funds. Considering that quality buyside opportunities are very rare for IBD associates, I would say this is a worthwhile offer.
The obsession with carry (exhibited by many private equity hopefuls) baffles me. It's like getting paid in stock options with no observable market value and a way out-of-the-money strike price (after all, the value of the fund assets need to rise materially for the GP's carried interest to be worth something). Total expected comp is what matters, and all else equal, I'd rather have more of that target comp paid in salary than annual bonus, and more annual bonus than carry.
I have to agree with the above to an extent. Carry is both uncertain and not available for 5-7 years. In the early stages of your career, your discount rate should be pretty high (i.e. money today is significantly more valuable than money in 5 years):
If you stay in PE, the money you get from your carry in the early years will be peanuts compared to your comp 5-7 years in . If you leave PE, having significant wealth tied up and unavailable while you are trying to change careers is a serious pain. Either way, there is a massive advantage to having cash in hand when you're young.
Thanks guys very helpful. Actually BB comp in Asia is 'globalised' and the same as NYC somehow PE seems less so hence making the comp jump smaller than one would expect in the US.
Just so I understand how exactly does carry work? Iis it one big lumpsum amount when the fund closes or is it an annual figure based on some nominal (not actual) return calculation?
Voluptatem molestiae velit laboriosam sunt voluptatum velit reiciendis reiciendis. Rerum quo quia repudiandae nemo. Corporis qui qui ut et. Numquam nihil esse est alias perspiciatis.
Soluta ut tenetur temporibus occaecati consequatur est. Consequatur molestiae totam quas sed culpa. Quod ut fugit veniam quibusdam impedit. Nostrum delectus iusto veniam architecto.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...