Anyone have info on these groups at some of the larger funds (Apollo, TPG, etc.)?
Does it really have less prestige than generalist PE? How does comp differ? Is it a useless, low returns group solely for the purpose of boosting ESG scores? How competitive is it? Will it pigeonhole me? Would I be better off in generalist MM PE?
| +156 | Future of PE | 34 | 8h |
| +36 | Best industry/job for entrepreneurship? | 11 | 5h |
| +20 | How to Get on Career Track / Stay Post ASO years | 6 | 5d |
| +19 | Burn Out in PE - What Comes Next? | 3 | 1d |
| +18 | What are you actually using AI for in PE? | 4 | 8h |
| +12 | Buyside in London with nice WLB and pay | 4 | 35m |
| +10 | Undergrad summer PE analyst positions | 3 | 2d |
| +9 | Value Creation Initiatives (That aren't add-ons) | 2 | 2d |
| +9 | 2028 Oncycle PE | 11 | 1d |
| +9 | Question about HH 2028 | 2 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
This area is a bit of a mix. These funds have been created because a subset of influential LPs want them. At the same time, some average deals are being dressed up as “impact” or ESG. Because of this dynamic, if you can work for the flagship or core fund that would be better.
Feel like it’s just a different kind of investing. E.g. someone interested in impact/climate investing is probably not someone who wants to join a typical buyout fund. Same goes for the exit opps - if you want to do something impact related/go to Bschool then it might help more, if you want to do something else then it might help less.
Know from a kid in my class that the comp is the same, at least at the associate level.
Am curious how the WLB/hours differ from the typical buyout groups at places like Apollo/TPG.
Apollo and TPG Climate are very different (APO is a rebranding of the nat resources group, TPG is more impact/growth oriented with some infra). Each climate fund overall is very different so do you homework
It will pigeonhole you (but in different ways as those funds are so different) and I recommend staying out if you aren’t actually interested
Apollo and TPG Climate are very different (APO is a rebranding of the nat resources group, TPG is more impact/growth oriented with some infra). Each climate fund overall is very different so do you homework
It will pigeonhole you (but in different ways as those funds are so different) and I recommend staying out if you aren’t actually interested
Take a look at BeyondNetZero, it’s a growth fund under General Atlantic.
Totam quae error dolore sit eligendi ut maiores. Quam neque qui distinctio maxime eius dicta quos odio. Autem ut aut et occaecati. Optio est ut quibusdam quia earum est alias. Quia modi vel unde dignissimos cum qui officia. Illo atque ullam et.
Officiis beatae occaecati nulla tempore natus. Recusandae necessitatibus possimus quae voluptatem quisquam ipsum quisquam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...