Implied EBITDA Multiple With DCF

This is a two-part question related to DCF's, Valuation and Debt.

Background: I did an EBITDA Multiple valuation scenario analysis, less debt for the equity value. Then did a DCF to cross-check. The two are nowhere in the ballpark...then I dook out net debt out of the valuation and it aligned very nicely.

My question is... 1. When doing a DCF and connecting to the implied EBITDA Multiple of a privately owned company, looking for the equity value, I know you are supposed to take out the debt, or is it the net debt (debt-cash)? Which one is it? 2. If the EBITDA x Multiple and the DCF are way off, what would be the best way to think through the mistakes in the model?

Thank you in advance for the help.

Regards,

Michael

3 Comments
 
  1. Net debt. Enterprise Value = Equity Value + Debt & Equivalents - Cash & Equivalents

  2. A difference between multiples-valuation and DCF-valuation does not necessarily mean there is an error. This simply means the market is valuing a company greater/lesser than the intrinsic value of its future cash flows. Of course, your assumptions would be the drivers for DCF-valuation differing from multiples-valuation, irrespective of whether or not they are "correct".

 

Cupiditate nam placeat et sed expedita ipsum a. Voluptas harum aliquam sit sed perferendis dignissimos. Veritatis suscipit modi qui modi. Ad qui animi sequi autem. Fugiat quia dolores deserunt vero rerum et. At unde in rem aliquam distinctio.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (105) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (413) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”