In most cases, will going international work against your long-term career?

I'm struggling pretty hard writing this off, because I don't know if I have considered all the variables, and it also kind of goes against my gut feeling. 

I'm not a know-it-all and am kindly requesting a candid discussion based on your experience (if it applies).

context) For a while, I had the curiosity to entertain the idea of going to East/Southeast Asia, or Europe as a junior private investor (growth/buyouts).



reason1) However, after reading the posts here, I've come to understand that Europe/Asia have local talent that speak their language, have amazing training, and have family/engrained connections that will ensure that they can source proprietary deals/fundraise (and move up family businesses or in the few private investing seats).

reason2) I have also read that private equity is smaller/less successful in these places, because most national megacorps (in each country) that are family-controlled have little interest in selling their companies, and seldom entertain buying smaller ones from mmpe shops.

reason3) It seems once i go abroad, i will have a very tough time coming back into the US because of a supposed experience discount abroad, let alone the lack of deal reps/expertise in us verticals.

conclusion) So based on this information, it seems like leaving the US (as someone with no connection to these places) + (the supposed structural disadvantage of pe outside the US) would be a very foolish decision.

ask) My question to you is, would you draw the same conclusion about the unappeal of working abroad? Do you largely have the same premises/justification, or are there other variables you are considering?

6 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, your concerns about pursuing a private equity career abroad are valid, but the decision ultimately depends on your long-term goals and personal circumstances. Here's a breakdown of the key points to consider:

  1. Local Talent and Connections:
    You're correct that Europe and Asia have strong local talent pools with language skills, cultural understanding, and established networks. These factors can make it challenging for outsiders to compete, especially in sourcing proprietary deals or navigating family-controlled businesses. Local connections often play a significant role in deal-making and career progression in these regions.

  2. Structural Challenges in PE Abroad:
    Private equity markets outside the US, particularly in Asia and parts of Europe, are often less developed. For example:

    • In Asia, PE deals tend to focus more on growth or minority investments rather than buyouts, which may not align with the skillset you'd develop in the US.
    • Many family-controlled businesses in these regions are reluctant to sell, limiting deal flow for PE firms.
    • Exits can be more difficult, especially in regions like Africa or Southeast Asia, where the market for $100mm+ deals is limited.
  3. Repatriation Challenges:
    Returning to the US after working abroad can indeed be difficult. As noted in WSO threads, professionals who spend 2-3 years abroad often face challenges re-entering the US market due to:

    • A perceived "experience discount" for international roles.
    • Limited exposure to US-specific deal structures, verticals, and market dynamics.
    • Differences in deal complexity and scale, which may not match the expectations of US firms.
  4. Exceptions and Opportunities:
    While the challenges are real, there are exceptions:

    • Working in a major financial hub like London or Hong Kong can still provide valuable experience, especially if you're at a top-tier firm with global deal exposure.
    • Certain sectors, like energy in Africa (e.g., Actis), or sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East, may offer unique opportunities that align with specific career goals.
    • If you have a strong personal interest in a particular region or sector, the experience could still be worthwhile, even if it comes with trade-offs.

Conclusion:

Your reasoning is sound, and for most professionals without strong local connections or a clear strategic reason to go abroad, staying in the US or a major global hub like London may offer better long-term career prospects. However, if you have a compelling personal or professional reason to work internationally, it could still be a rewarding experience, provided you carefully weigh the trade-offs and have a plan for re-entering the US market if needed.

Sources: Q&A: Megafund Asia Private Equity, Working Abroad - Regrets/Benefits, Non US/Europe IB/PE Overview, 6 Things to Consider Before Accepting an International Work Assignment

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

As background, a spent a couple of years in HK / SG early in my career (as a banker, not investor). I'm white and grew up in a small city in (a fairly remote part of) the UK. So, no cultural background.

First, I think it's very low likelihood that you'll find a role in that part of the world unless you have some sort of language or connection already. Like you say, there's exceptional local talent, and language capabilities are highly sought-after / borderline essential.

Second, as a junior anywhere you aren't going to be sourcing deals; I mean if you can, fantastic, but it isn't going to be the expectation. Don't set yourself that benchmark as a measure of whether to go abroad.

Third, yes it's true that IB fee pools are smaller and PE ticket sizes are smaller. I don't think that's a reason not to go, especially as a junior. You have a long career ahead of you and a lot can change. You might learn a little less than at a shop in the US, but you'll still get plenty reps, and it's a dirty little secret that even at a place like KKR or CD&R in New York you can spend a couple years or more as a junior (or senior) and still not close a deal.

Fourth, it's almost always the case that moving team / sector / geography / whatever will carry a step back in seniority / progression, as well as comp. Honestly I think this is one of the most misguided things especially junios worry about.  We'd all prefer more money than less money, but we're still being paid in the top 1%, and another dirty secret is that Principals / Directors can spend years and years longer than expected to get promoted for the fairly arbitrary reason that there's just too many seniors at the level above.

Fifth, the couple of years I spent overseas were, personally, two of the best of my life. Hard not to like living on a tropical island, but it was such a remarkable (and very fun) experience in helping me grow and see more of the world (and get paid a lot of money at low, low tax rates to do it).

In sum, I think you're going to find it extremely tough to find a role I think. But if you do, I'd grab it with both hands. When you're 70 you aren't going to care / remember the date you made Partner / blah blah. But you'll remember your time living overseas in a totally new environment. And life is so unpredictable I try not to plan and game theory life too far into the future

 

Thanks for your honest thoughts.

Ok, so it seems consensus is that it's a bad option if I only care about money/promotion visibility. Although, I'm indifferent towards travel, so the new environment wouldn't be enough of a factor to be worth pursuing. And thank you for sharing the dirty secret, I didn't know that. Appreciate the wisdom on this attitude being misguided, I'll try to get rid of this stubborn mindset.

 

Do y'all have any more perspectives in the community? Otherwise, content with the confirmation from WACCula

 

Ex tempore saepe voluptatem accusantium non. Nihil numquam sit fuga accusantium quam. Minima consequatur omnis non impedit dolore officia. Maxime modi voluptatibus repellendus id dolore voluptatem et.

Aut dolor harum laboriosam fuga facere saepe ea ducimus. Ab ipsum porro officiis ratione doloremque aut. Vel qui facere aliquid.

Explicabo ad accusamus omnis sapiente. Excepturi quasi quod sed esse. Qui voluptatem eius debitis incidunt labore quaerat. Unde autem rerum magnam sunt aut aperiam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”