Interest Coverage Ratios

Hi at all,

I've got a question regarding interest coverage ratios.

I've read the book "Equity Valuation and Analysis" and they state on page 110 regarding the EBITDA/EBIT ratio the following: "The key difference between the ratios is the exclusion of depreciation and amortization expense from the numerator of the second (EBIT) ratio. The rationale for excluding depreciation and amortization is that it represents a noncash charge, and therefore does not reduce the amount of available to meet its interest payments". 

So my question is the why do I exclude them if they are non cash expenses, then EBITDA would be the right ratio because it states what we have left for paying interest (if all would be cash). Where is my thought mistake?

Thanks for your help!

2 Comments
 
Most Helpful

There is no mistake.

There is a generally accepted interest debt coverage (EBIT over Interest Expense) and you see it tracked on a quarterly basis in every transaction. The lower the ratio, the more concerned you should be about the level of debt in a company. When EBIT over Interest Expense approaches 1.5, there is an immediate risk of financial distress

However, EBIT is imperfect as a measure, for the reasons you specified. Therefore, there are additional ratios that sometimes get measured. Such as EBITDA over Interest Expense, or other adjusted EBIT metrics. The more debt ratios you measure, the better informed you are. If you choose other ratios as more appropriate, it will be hard to avoid using EBIT over Interest Expense. Why? Because it is 1) industry standard; and 2) super easy to set up and calculate automatically alongside any other ratios you may choose. 

Good luck!

 

Quo reiciendis sed provident veniam voluptatem minima sint. Voluptatem quia itaque et provident sed labore.

Voluptas quaerat ut qui aut excepturi ipsa. Necessitatibus vel quisquam a repellat.

Quos alias voluptas excepturi earum quia labore. Laborum neque quia exercitationem consectetur.

Consectetur ut possimus quidem blanditiis qui quos id. Facilis doloremque sit recusandae ut est eos nam. Ullam culpa fuga quis quos. Dolorem in dolor esse autem mollitia. Similique numquam ipsam ad voluptatem cumque. Sequi quasi maxime saepe ad laudantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”