Hi guys:
I have a quick question please.. in some cases, why would IRR of an LBO be more sensitive to EBITDA margin change than to Revenue CAGR change?
For example, my IRR declines ~2% for each 1% decline in revenue CAGR during projection period; but my IRR declines ~3% for every 1% decline in annual EBITDA margin during projection period.
How can one ball-park test if these are correct? How can one think about these?
Thanks!
| +89 | Nothing to do at work & bored to hell | 9 | 6h |
| +67 | Do people over-index on 'moats' | 20 | 1d |
| +52 | Predicted Net Worth in Trodden Finance Path by 60? | 20 | 6h |
| +44 | Biggest (avoidable) failures in PE Investments? | 25 | 1h |
| +38 | Why is ROIC never really a topic when looking at companies IRL | 11 | 3d |
| +28 | SGE Final Round (Investment Summer Analyst) - Case Study & Technicals? | 14 | 1h |
| +19 | Senior IR Lifestyle | 3 | 5d |
| +12 | How to approach Buyside Recruiting | 3 | 4d |
| +12 | Honest opinions needed about lateraling | 4 | 1d |
| +12 | NY LMM PE Recruiting | 3 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
It’s all situation dependent but generally if your revenue base is $100 and margin is 30%. A 100bps absolute change is margin is $1 of value (don’t forget about the ongoing multiple effect) but 1% increase of revenue is on $0.30 of value that year (and more value when multiplied by the exit multiple) yet this is lower than 100bps change in margin.
I would think about this in terms of the nature of the investment and drivers of return. It
sounds like you are evaluating an opportunity that is profitable / cash generative, and exiting off an EBITDA multiple. In that case, your return will be much more sensitive to changes in EBITDA / margin much more than revenue (as a $1 increase or decrease to revenue obviously only passes through at a certain percentage).
On the other hand, if you were looking at a growth opportunity that may be unprofitable or just reaching breakeven where exit will be driven off revenue multiple (which is usually in-turn a function of revenue growth), then your return should be more sensitive to changes to revenue / growth.
Eius aut dolor esse voluptatibus. Deleniti aut sit quo itaque.
Tempora nobis fugit vitae quo. Voluptate aliquid et modi tenetur saepe. Fuga provident laborum consequatur fugiat tempora corporis et.
Esse atque laudantium molestias provident reiciendis quis. Perferendis et quia labore et aliquam. Totam placeat similique est aperiam repellendus aut quia.
Quia fugiat praesentium aut iste. Nihil quia eius qui error ex. Et voluptas expedita totam praesentium voluptas exercitationem. Et neque et odit ad.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...