IRR more sensitive to EBITDA margin than Revenue CAGR - why?

Hi guys:

I have a quick question please.. in some cases, why would IRR of an LBO be more sensitive to EBITDA margin change than to Revenue CAGR change?

For example, my IRR declines ~2% for each 1% decline in revenue CAGR during projection period; but my IRR declines ~3% for every 1% decline in annual EBITDA margin during projection period.

How can one ball-park test if these are correct? How can one think about these?

Thanks!

3 Comments
 

It’s all situation dependent but generally if your revenue base is $100 and margin is 30%. A 100bps absolute change is margin is $1 of value (don’t forget about the ongoing multiple effect) but 1% increase of revenue is on $0.30 of value that year (and more value when multiplied by the exit multiple) yet this is lower than 100bps change in margin.

 
Most Helpful

I would think about this in terms of the nature of the investment and drivers of return. It

sounds like you are evaluating an opportunity that is profitable / cash generative, and exiting off an EBITDA multiple. In that case, your return will be much more sensitive to changes in EBITDA / margin much more than revenue (as a $1 increase or decrease to revenue obviously only passes through at a certain percentage).

On the other hand, if you were looking at a growth opportunity that may be unprofitable or just reaching breakeven where exit will be driven off revenue multiple (which is usually in-turn a function of revenue growth), then your return should be more sensitive to changes to revenue / growth.

 

Accusamus sapiente accusamus excepturi aut. Rerum id distinctio sit sunt odio. Harum omnis in officiis nihil dolor eos necessitatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.2%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (236) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (40) $79
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”