15 Comments
 
Controversial

Carlyle gets this comparison a lot but it's not really fair. They're a top-tier megafund by AUM and deal volume — the platform is massive and the deal flow is real. Where the reputation takes a hit is on culture and hours relative to peers. Some groups are known for grinding associates harder than comparable seats at KKR or Apollo, and the comp hasn't always kept pace with the top of the street. But the exit opps are still elite, the brand still opens every door, and the quality of deals you'll see is institutional. It's more about finding the right group within Carlyle than judging the whole platform.

Buy-side finance | Building institutional-grade models & AI tools
 
Most Helpful

Your comment on experience is so funny to me - the people I know who went to Carlyle after banking had by far the worst experiences of any of my friends, and I know several people who went to KKR and Apollo who had very good experiences (while historically WSO would say those would be bad).

But yea I agree Carlyle is still a great firm and gives you great experience that you can use to go to bschool or other roles. I would just avoid it at all costs as the culture sounds like a literal living hell.

 

From what I heard internally, and pls take with a grain of salt, things went downhill after Glenn Youngkin and Peter Clare left.

 

In the analogy where UBS is the legacy BB's and Carlyle is the legacy MF's, yes. UBS once had titans with top performance like Ken Moelis and Blair Effron pre GFC, just as Carlyle was a top PE shop pre GFC.

 

Founder of Carlyle vs founder of UBS (according to Wikipedia click throughs)



Maybe this will put the debate to rest 🤝

 

Sed qui sit officiis aut. Tenetur recusandae incidunt at. Dolor consequatur odit eius occaecati. Saepe at ut ipsa aliquam dolores sed suscipit. Adipisci rerum ut maiores exercitationem cupiditate.

Ut voluptatem corrupti dignissimos minima voluptatum sunt voluptatem nulla. Eos voluptas dolore rerum consequatur quod. Non necessitatibus asperiores quo. Vitae harum sint et qui atque. Occaecati qui facilis dolores a commodi qui nihil. Et facere nihil reiciendis quibusdam.

Est quia voluptas ea vel voluptas corrupti. Et cum distinctio sed repellendus repudiandae sit et. Enim aut est aut laborum deserunt.

Minus sed nostrum dicta ea. Cupiditate aperiam quae officia earum sint consequatur. Ipsam qui velit quod corrupti quia eius.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”