KKR 2021 Analyst NGT (TMT Growth) Thread
Would a mid tier BB IB/EB position be better than this role considering it’s 80% sourcing (I.e. current associates said this)? I’m interested in growth equity more so than pe, but I’m not sure if it’s ideal to lose out on the technical modeling skills I would learn in IB. I’m thinking it may make more sense to go into IB first then growth equity.
I’ll take a pro-sourcing stance here as a growth equity associate myself.
The most important asset any investor has is internal benchmarks — being able to know what’s good from a metrics perspective, what business models are interesting, and what problems are beneath the surface or around the corner.
When you call 500 companies a year, review initial data for 200, and seriously work toward an LOI for 25-50 you develop that mental model a LOT faster than you do in banking or consulting where you might be on one project for a long time, and might only own a small piece of it.
Being good at diligence is an important skill too... but the best prep for being good at growth equity DD is actually doing growth equity DD on the buyside, not sellside advisory work for control deals in larger / more mature businesses.
Diligence skills are also much more commoditized than sourcing skills, and the latter is what people get hired for at the senior level.
If you know you want to do growth, you’d be dumb not to take what sounds like a great opportunity.