KPS 3-statement LBO Test
Interested in recruiting for KPS once I start full-time and have heard they give out a pretty difficult model test where you build a 3-statement LBO from scratch in 75min and have to manually enter the historical financials from a PDF CIM.
From those that have done it before, how was it? Were there any curveballs or special features that they tested?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to know about 3-statement model tests and LBO modeling tests:
Time Constraints:
Manual Data Entry:
Focus Areas:
Technical Skills:
Common Challenges:
Preparation Tips:
Additional Advice:
By focusing on these areas, you can better prepare for the KPS 3-statement model test and increase your chances of success.
Sources: Citadel (Surveyor) Case Study/Modeling Test, Former MS M&A / KKR here to field questions, Guide to Lateraling in 2021, Ask me anything - MM PE Associate, 1 year in, Private Equity Recruiting Process (From Banking)
Bump
Bump
Not that difficult, way harder model tests out there. Not sure why there’s gets so much attention
Second this, time crunch for sure but nothing overwhelming in terms of concepts
Any extra color here
Bump
Bump
bump
The, uh, commercially circulating KPS model test that's floating around there is very dated and not nearly as hard as the actual one. If you can do PF scratch in an hour you can probably knock out KPS at about the same clip, if not faster, and have time left over for pretty colors and formatting.
What is PF Scratch?
Doing a scratch LBO of Peak Frameworks. Honestly think hitting level 3 from scratch and knowing just the mechanics for levels 4 and 5 might be enough? Full-on modeling add-ons in a model test for a company is stupid IMO. Same with dividend recaps.
I did it a long time ago and didn’t know what they meant by plug equity to balance the opening balance sheet / goodwill / or something. I don’t remember exactly but it was wording I hadn’t seen and haven’t seen since
Been a long time since I did it but remember this line. Basically just saying that (I think) since you don't get a full B/S showing the pre-transaction book value of equity before you do the whole pro forma goodwill thing, you assume that it's the difference between the pre-transaction assets and liabilities, which you construct through I think some kind of NWC roll (that's done for you) on top of straight blue-cell typing for some rows?
In any case, the forums talked about how there'd be some super complicated liabilities during the transaction based on NWC usage and whatnot but that's just not the case anymore.
Qui quibusdam et quidem ut voluptatum culpa doloribus. Autem ea iure voluptas dolores provident fugit minima. Et architecto aperiam voluptatibus aliquid quaerat dolorum iste. Consequuntur fugit modi qui omnis ut eum corporis. Eius et voluptatibus est. Quae nihil molestiae rerum est quia accusantium cumque. Similique odio cupiditate dicta quia vel explicabo mollitia tempore.
Eum cum et animi vero. Aut nisi consequatur officiis eum. Doloremque commodi sint minus quia delectus aut.
Velit voluptates laboriosam ut laboriosam nam voluptatem. Sequi earum nostrum officiis. Velit incidunt praesentium deserunt quis dicta est.
Cum delectus quia rerum ducimus ea. Id sunt eligendi et aliquam mollitia minima ut. Beatae voluptatem minus et id sed. Sint blanditiis excepturi nisi culpa voluptate vitae. Saepe minus fuga enim officiis nobis iste. Magni autem voluptatem hic quia qui accusantium. Rerum nisi repellat quibusdam odit suscipit dolore non sit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...