10 Comments
 

thanks soulsearching. but i mean, how would you determine that in a model? from what i've seen, they've generally just made an assumption.

 
Best Response

The funny thing is, most of the big recent LBOs have a time horizon of more like 2-3 years (think Hellman & Friedman / Doubleclick here)... it's very very rare for a company to be held for 7 years, simply because earning a good IRR is much harder to attain if you own it for that long. 5 years is more reasonable but even that is long by recent standards. Though, if the economy goes/continues to be sour and the credit crunch lasts, PEs will have no choice but to hold their portfolio companies for the near future, which may increase the avg. time to exit.

The time held is not really dependent on future cash flow/deleveraging... I mean, in a sense it is because you want some debt to be paid off, but market conditions almost have more of an impact. Going back to the example above, with online marketing hot this year, H&F saw fit to sell Doubleclick and take advantage of a bidding war and heightened valuations. If you can sell and get a great price, PEs will sell.

 

Great! thanks for that explanation. It really puts things into perspective. BTW, does anyone have a link/tutorial on LBO model or anything that will help to better understand how they're valued?

 

Generally, you have to assume the sponsor wants at least a 20% IRR. Typically, 25% is the norm and usually they'll do some work (acquisitions/restructuring etc) to get it higher. You're exit is also influenced by market conditions, if you need to close the fund from which you made the investment, etc.

Value creation encompasses the following - at exit, assuming it deleverages (not a given, I've looked at deals where 3 years later leverage is the same or higher given acquisitions and crap performance) by having cash as a greater % of the capital structure than when you entered the transaction and by assuming EBITDA/multiple expansion (e.g. you bought the company for 10x EBITDA which was say €30m. 3 years later you're hoping the industry/growth prospects of company/whatever has led to margin uplift so now when you sell it the company will be bought for more than 10x, and you're hoping that EBITDA has grown.

 

Not to make things more complicated for folks here, but as a clarifying point it should be noted that the end game for creating equity value in an LBO is not necessarily achieved through de-leveraging a company.

In fact, there are a number of reasons that a very successful investment may have the same or higher levels of debt at exit than it did at entry. Years ago, the fund where I currently work did an acquisition for ~$3.0 bn in enterprise value -- roughly $2.6 bn of this was funded with debt while the balance ($400 mm) was funded with equity. At the time of the acquisition, the company's LTM EBITDA was ~$400 mm. Two years later the company's EBITDA had grown to ~$500 mm, and we were able to issue additional subordinated notes for ~$400 mm.

Essentially, we were able to get out 100% of our initial equity investment through a recap within two years (because the additional sub debt accrued PIK interest and sat below all other debt, the other senior creditors had no issue with the recap). Total leverage on the deal relative to EBITDA was similar to what it had been at close; however, we had received 100% of our principal investment while still holding the same controlling equity interest in the business.

While a riskier strategy, the most efficient use of capital in an LBO is involves re-leveraging, and not de-leveraging, a portfolio company.

 

Voluptatem commodi vero eum doloribus consequatur debitis eum. Assumenda odio sequi quaerat molestias beatae quas nemo. Maiores tempore magni et accusamus. Possimus deserunt aut iure pariatur quidem eligendi.

Est laboriosam autem voluptates tenetur aliquid consequatur. Error est quibusdam dolore sunt.

Sed quas eligendi rem qui ut minima aut. Laboriosam eaque earum consequuntur commodi qui ratione. Non quia rerum dolor. Suscipit consequuntur temporibus aliquam repudiandae qui. Illum est et magnam est animi. Qui asperiores aut aliquam corporis.

Error quidem aut ad quia dolorem perspiciatis beatae. Ea eum ut nobis voluptate aspernatur quaerat sit. Recusandae asperiores dolor rem iusto voluptate facere rerum. Sint omnis mollitia id sed assumenda aut iusto. Nesciunt quae qui recusandae molestias. Est sunt at eum quisquam consequuntur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”