LBO Test - Debt Terms

Hi Everyone,

I've got a few PE interviews coming up and expecting typical LBO Tests/Case Studies to be coming up. As I'm prepping for these, I'm wondering what sort of debt terms would be reasonable to assume for these if none are provided. Obviously in the real world terms would very much depend on deal type, industry, leverage, etc., but in a plain vanilla LBO Test for some consumer, industrial or software asset, would interviewers expect multiple tranches of debt with different terms, repayments, PIK, etc.? Or could I - for simplicity, given the test environment - reasonably assume something like the following: 

- 6.0x TLA, 8% interest (since I likely won't have LIBOR figures, wouldn't use a spread), 5% amortization plus cash sweep
- 0.5x Revolver (undrawn), at 5% interest with 0.5% undrawn fee 

Additionally assuming 3% fees on total financing amount.

Thanks in advance! 

2 Comments
 

Ah, gearing up for the PE interview marathon, are we? Let's dive into the jungle of LBO tests and see what kind of debt terms might help you swing through those case studies like a pro.

When it comes to LBO tests, especially in PE interviews, you're right to think that the real world is a vast, varied jungle with all sorts of creatures (or, in this case, deal types, industries, and leverage scenarios). However, in the controlled environment of an interview, things tend to be a bit more... let's say, standardized.

Your approach to simplifying the debt structure is not only reasonable but also quite savvy for a test environment. Let's break down your assumptions and see how they align with the wisdom found in the Wall Street Oasis (WSO) forums:

  • 6.0x Term Loan A (TLA), 8% interest, 5% amortization plus cash sweep: This is a solid assumption for a senior secured term loan. It's within the ballpark of what's considered reasonable for LBO financing. The interest rate you've chosen is a bit on the higher side, which could be seen as conservative but realistic, especially if you're not using LIBOR or another reference rate. The 5% amortization is also a prudent choice, showing that you're thinking about the debt repayment schedule. The cash sweep mechanism is a nice touch, indicating that excess cash flow will be used to pay down debt faster, which is something lenders love.

  • 0.5x Revolver (undrawn), at 5% interest with 0.5% undrawn fee: This is a smart way to include a revolving credit facility (RCF) in your capital structure. The undrawn nature of the revolver at the outset is typical, as it's often used for working capital needs or as a liquidity buffer. The interest rate and undrawn fee you've assumed are reasonable and show that you understand the slightly lower cost of revolvers compared to term loans, due to their secured, short-term nature.

  • Additionally assuming 3% fees on total financing amount: Including financing fees is an important detail that candidates often overlook. It shows you're considering the total cost of securing the debt, not just the interest expense. A 3% fee is within the realm of possibility, though it might be on the higher end depending on the specifics of the deal and the lenders involved.

In summary, your assumptions are quite reasonable for an LBO test in a PE interview setting. They demonstrate a good understanding of LBO financing structures and the costs associated with them. Just remember, the key in these interviews is not just the numbers themselves, but your ability to justify them based on the scenario at hand. So, be prepared to explain why you chose these terms and how they fit into the overall investment thesis of the LBO.

Good luck with your interviews! Remember, in the jungle of PE, being prepared is half the battle.

Sources: Debt for LBO?, Creating own LBO assumptions, Private Credit Resources and Prep, How to think about Debt for Acquisitions

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Cupiditate quisquam est vel dolor quod accusamus occaecati. Dolor nesciunt et placeat.

Qui ut aliquid reiciendis ad aliquid quae. Aspernatur blanditiis ipsa eum minima in quis est.

Voluptas temporibus molestiae occaecati odio ut quod. Amet in consequatur ipsam natus corrupti cum saepe ex. Suscipit qui vel assumenda fugiat doloremque soluta. Similique dicta similique aliquam deserunt. Quia temporibus ut aut dolorem esse.

Asperiores neque earum tempora doloremque rerum voluptates. Praesentium at et voluptate eius. Dolorem ab debitis dolor dolores molestiae. Ea dolorum aut sed ab. Est vero hic et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”