LMM PE vs MM IB Analyst
Hi all,
Currently have two opportunities that I wanted to gain the public's opinions on. I'm confident in the coming weeks I may have two offers on the board, one being a MM IB analyst role and the second being an analyst role at a LMM PE/PC shop. With comp and location aside, I am looking for the opportunity that gives me the best chance of remaining on the buy-side and having the chance to move up to a solid LMM shop in 2-3 years (think Trivest, FFL, Gryphon).
Context: MM IB is like a Citizens or Truist level. LMM shop is tiny (10 people total), but has been alive for 20+ years, on its sixth fund and good track record. I'd be investing across equity, mezzanine, and debt, as well as looking over portcos and doing reporting.
So which one would set me up better: a no-name LMM buy-side shop where I have a slew of responsibilities, or a MM IB firm that will give me the regular banking skillset that most PE shops look for when recruiting?
When deciding between an LMM PE analyst role and an MM IB analyst role, the choice largely depends on your long-term career goals and the type of experience you want to gain. Based on the most helpful WSO content, here’s a breakdown to help you decide:
LMM PE Analyst Role
Pros:
Cons:
MM IB Analyst Role
Pros:
Cons:
Key Considerations for Your Goal
Staying on the Buy-Side:
Optionality and Skill Development:
Networking and Recruiting:
Recommendation
If your ultimate goal is to stay in private equity and you’re confident in the LMM shop’s track record and learning opportunities, the LMM PE role could be a great fit. However, if you want to maximize optionality, build a strong technical foundation, and have a more traditional path to PE, the MM IB role is the better choice.
Pro Tip: If you choose the LMM PE role, invest time in developing your technical skills (e.g., financial modeling) and networking to ensure you remain competitive for future opportunities. If you go the MM IB route, start preparing for PE recruiting early, as the process can begin within months of starting your analyst role.
Sources: https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/just-broke-into-ib-as-a-lateral-how-do-plan-my-move-to-pe?customgpt=1, MM PE out of undergrad worth it?, Q&A: Barclays IB to MM Private Equity, Feel Trapped, Exit Opps From Sell-Side ER?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/going-from-mm-investment-bank-to-mega-fund?customgpt=1
I would take MM IB role over a 10 person LMM shop. I have friends who went IB route and have all landed very solid buy-side seats from similar prestige. Working at a 10 person shop will be much harder to move upward IMO. Would also be worth looking at how their past analysts have done after their stint to see possible options.
I'll just say this: all things equal, I'd pick the candidate from the IBs you mention vs. this shop to join my firm as an associate. The IB analyst experience almost always better than PE analyst, with the exception being a select few of the biggest PE funds. It's a known product - gives you the best training, network, and career optionality with the resume stamp. At this starting point of your career, you should opt for those factors to best set you up for success. Even if that fund's strategy is what you end up wanting to do forever, you would still be better off IMO starting in banking.
Ahh yes, the lesser known, lean LMM firm, Gryphon. The same Gryphon that has had multiple $1b+ exits...
Do some research my man. Trivest, Gryphon, etc are all very solid MM+ and UMM firms. lol
Citizens are Truist are not MM. They are solidly LMM. MM would be HL, Harris Williams, Baird, Blair, etc.
bro those are not close to UMM. solidly MM sure
Wow good thing I said they were at least MM (some do consider Gryphon an UMM). Just do some research. Sure they do some smaller investments but so does Apollo. That doesn't mean Apollo is an UMM firm.
Ea et alias dolores ullam exercitationem soluta velit. Qui sint et quis minima velit aut. Aut ex deleniti fugit iste blanditiis deserunt. Doloribus odit incidunt placeat quia.
Perferendis inventore nihil totam nesciunt ut. Dolorem sequi et aspernatur praesentium veniam est quaerat. Quaerat ipsa autem numquam ut accusantium maiores asperiores.
Inventore ut voluptatibus quae et. Sunt id voluptate molestiae alias quae aut iste. Quia aut minima voluptatem blanditiis qui. Aut ut voluptatibus tempore sit dolores. Rerum qui numquam velit rem quo est autem.
Eveniet ipsum doloremque doloremque. Explicabo ipsam harum repudiandae qui maxime. Voluptatem quis et cum aspernatur tempore.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...