MF (BX, Apollo, Carlyle, KKR, TPG, Oaktree) vs BB (GS, MS, JP)

Hi,

I'm in my final year MSc in Europe and am in this (good) situation:

I got some months ago a SA offer for IBD at a BB (GS, MS, JP) in London, where the probability to get a FT are historically quite high.

Now, I have received also an offer for an internship at a MF in London (think KKR, BX, Carlyle, Oaktree, TPG, Apollo), where there are chances to get a FT but they are much lower than in the IBD case.

Given the fact that I have previous experience at a Middle Market PE fund, I am confident that in the future I want to be in one of those MF fund (so I would prefer the PE offer), however I am a bit scared to accept the MF PE offer by the low chances to get the FT at that fund, in which case I would be in the difficult position to find a FT somewhere else: indeed, it's rare to get in as analyst in those other funds, and for IBD I would recruit only for two BBs for FT (the third one won't probably consider me, if I renege their offer), and I wouldn't like to consider other banks (not because I have something against them, but simply because for the future recruiting for Private Equity positions, GS, MS and JP are more powerful brands).

What do you suggest to do?
I'm trying to postpone to September the start of the PE offer, but it's unlikely to happen, given the first feedback.

Comments (20)

2y 
Mr_oaklins, what's your opinion? Comment below:

It really depends. What is the MF role for? The only MF with Analyst positions in real PE roles is BX. Apollo/KKR/... all have for credit roles. Is this what you want to do? Moreover, what previous experience do you have? If you already had experience in a BB maybe you are already skilled with the job and you are likely to perform well since the beginning. About not recruiting in any other place other than MS GS JPM: makes no sense imo. A lot of people in top roles come from EB/other BB

2y 
thomas_3000, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Thanks for your view.

It's an investment role and I have a solid work experience, not in a BB though.

As regards not recruiting for other banks, I may be a bit extreme and, should I be then in that position, I would probably recruit also for other banks; the fact is that they have lower brand power than GS, MS, JP, and the investment roles in MFs in London are limited.

2y 
Mr_oaklins, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Is the team where you would intern at the MF the one where you would like to stay? Then go there

Most Helpful
  • Research Analyst in HF - EquityHedge
2y 

Try postponing MF to off cycle?

Otherwise, was in a similar position but picked BB based on the following reasoning

- Re conversion rates, may be a real concern. Easier to convert BB SA to FT than to do MF SA then try to recruit BB FT. Lon FT headcount is low + Especially given COVID + Brexit now

- In the event you want to do something other than PE eventually, BB provides more generalist experience and usually more breadth of deals. Nothing really lost doing 1-2 years in IBD - If you are good enough to get the SA offer at the MF, you will likely be good enough to recruit for MF Assoc later on

- Overall, being in a large training class with other new analysts > being the only youngest analyst in a lean MF team (usually will be the case in Lon), at least for the first career year in my personal opinion

Boils down to personal situation and preference. Also obviously if based on recruiting process you liked one team a lot more then go with that one.

  • 2
2y 
thomas_3000, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Thanks!

They are very good points.

If I chose the MF PE, and then I wouldn't convert, which options do you think I would have?

  • Research Analyst in HF - EquityHedge
2y 

Probably try to recruit for BB FT? But realistically little spots so may end up recruiting for BB SA again.

What is the historical conversion rate at your fund, maybe try to talk to analysts there and find out whether they are looking to convert?

If conversion is the exception rather than the norm then best to be realistic

2y 
thomas_3000, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Thanks, but I don't believe that my chances to eventually convert into FT would change because someone at the MF PE reads that I carefully consider all elements for my career before making a choice.

As I said, my preference is for the MF PE, but the concern is in terms of conversion to FT, which is an objective element.

  • Associate 2 in PE - LBOs
2y 

What is the historical conversion rate for your fund? Did you recruit for the others BBs you mentioned and struck out (i.e. your current offer is your only shot) or do you still have a few gos left?

I'd personally back yourself and go PE - much more differentiating than analyst x'000 from GS

2y 
thomas_3000, what's your opinion? Comment below:

As far as I know, it's quite low (some years they convert, other years they don't)

At the moment, I only have those two offers and, you probably know better than me, FT recruiting is risky. 

I totally agree when you say that a MF PE profile would be much more "diverse" with respect to a BB one; my question however is: "how could I leverage it to get the best out of the MF PE internship?"

  • Associate 2 in PE - LBOs
2y 

It's clear you only have the two offers, but did you get rejected at the others, or simply not apply? If you didn't apply you can see it as having a few shots still. If you did and were rejected its a very different story

  • Prospect in IB-M&A
2y 

Oaktree is not going to convert.

  • Prospect in IB - Gen
2y 

Nisi ipsum ea autem quis qui repellendus maiores. Numquam quia corporis dolore amet rerum quo quis. Culpa mollitia nisi voluptatem pariatur unde impedit error.

Start Discussion

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2023 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2023 Private Equity

  • Ardian 99.5%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2023 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • Blackstone Group 97.9%
  • Ardian 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2023 Private Equity

  • Principal (8) $676
  • Director/MD (22) $599
  • Vice President (85) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (86) $276
  • 2nd Year Associate (192) $264
  • 1st Year Associate (372) $228
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (28) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (79) $133
  • 1st Year Analyst (227) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (30) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (288) $58