Net debt v Gross debt in LBO

Do we care about net debt or gross debt when we think about return in an LBO. For example, if we have gross debt of 100 initially, but that becomes 50 - but our net debt doesn't change at all, do we have any returns?

3 Comments
 

Usually you'd have a minimum cash balance (used for general operations/maintenance of business) that is used to calculate the net debt. All excess cash is used to sweep/prepay the appropriate tranches. In effect, you wouldn't see gross debt going down without net debt also going down, unless you're reclassifying min cash as excess cash to sweep. If that's the case then there's no change to returns because at exit you're already selling the company and using net debt (which accounts for min cash) to extract the sponsor exit equity.

Could you be more specific and give an example?

Array
 
Most Helpful

Stop spreading this FAKE MINIMUM CASH principle please. Seen it over 10 times in last couple of months here. Every company has a RCF line with the bank to cover cash-seasonality, you are not keeping money on the BS because you need it 1 day a year. Balance sheet date is also way to arbitrary to define any 'minimum amount' of cash (keeping all current assets and liabilities in mind) for this.

To TS: please provide an example where gross debt goes down and net debt does not change. You start with a ton of cash and make 0 cash in the holding period? Very theoretical case, can't think of any real-life examples for this. But in general; if net debt remains the same (and so does EBITDA) than there is no value creation indeed.

 

Et et quo eius nihil molestiae quod et. Sint nulla quaerat vitae labore.

Commodi magnam eligendi quisquam nam nemo quia consequuntur. Vero aut eveniet voluptas in qui neque quasi. Dignissimos est eaque quaerat accusantium eum iste. Repudiandae et eos dolor aliquid modi. Consequatur voluptatibus deserunt et rerum.

Laudantium ipsum veniam accusantium ea ut quo non dolorum. Voluptate eaque mollitia sit dolorem et. Quos vel tempora perferendis neque.

Numquam labore error perferendis et non. Consequatur asperiores tempore velit sit assumenda. Et reprehenderit perferendis eos debitis optio similique dolor. Maiores sed atque placeat ut culpa quos.

Array

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (105) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (413) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”