Net debt v Gross debt in LBO
Do we care about net debt or gross debt when we think about return in an LBO. For example, if we have gross debt of 100 initially, but that becomes 50 - but our net debt doesn't change at all, do we have any returns?
Do we care about net debt or gross debt when we think about return in an LBO. For example, if we have gross debt of 100 initially, but that becomes 50 - but our net debt doesn't change at all, do we have any returns?
| +137 | What’s “the path” now? | 56 | 1h |
| +86 | Is Everyone Too Bearish on PE? | 30 | 1h |
| +48 | Why would anyone do PE in long term in 2026? | 12 | 1d |
| +37 | 3rd Year IB Analyst, Top Bucket, Still No PE Offer. What Would You Do? | 19 | 5h |
| +25 | Is This Normal in LLM PE | 10 | 3d |
| +24 | Q&A: What It’s Actually Like Working at an Independent (Fundless) Sponsor | 4 | 1d |
| +21 | UMM PE or High Paying Strat Finance? | 9 | 59m |
| +21 | Striking out in last rounds | 2 | 2d |
| +20 | On Cycle Preparation | 8 | 1d |
| +16 | Would you use a centralized sponsor research page before meetings? | 6 | 6d |
Career Resources
Usually you'd have a minimum cash balance (used for general operations/maintenance of business) that is used to calculate the net debt. All excess cash is used to sweep/prepay the appropriate tranches. In effect, you wouldn't see gross debt going down without net debt also going down, unless you're reclassifying min cash as excess cash to sweep. If that's the case then there's no change to returns because at exit you're already selling the company and using net debt (which accounts for min cash) to extract the sponsor exit equity.
Could you be more specific and give an example?
Stop spreading this FAKE MINIMUM CASH principle please. Seen it over 10 times in last couple of months here. Every company has a RCF line with the bank to cover cash-seasonality, you are not keeping money on the BS because you need it 1 day a year. Balance sheet date is also way to arbitrary to define any 'minimum amount' of cash (keeping all current assets and liabilities in mind) for this.
To TS: please provide an example where gross debt goes down and net debt does not change. You start with a ton of cash and make 0 cash in the holding period? Very theoretical case, can't think of any real-life examples for this. But in general; if net debt remains the same (and so does EBITDA) than there is no value creation indeed.
Et et quo eius nihil molestiae quod et. Sint nulla quaerat vitae labore.
Commodi magnam eligendi quisquam nam nemo quia consequuntur. Vero aut eveniet voluptas in qui neque quasi. Dignissimos est eaque quaerat accusantium eum iste. Repudiandae et eos dolor aliquid modi. Consequatur voluptatibus deserunt et rerum.
Laudantium ipsum veniam accusantium ea ut quo non dolorum. Voluptate eaque mollitia sit dolorem et. Quos vel tempora perferendis neque.
Numquam labore error perferendis et non. Consequatur asperiores tempore velit sit assumenda. Et reprehenderit perferendis eos debitis optio similique dolor. Maiores sed atque placeat ut culpa quos.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...