On-Cycle / Off-Cycle Modeling Question

Looking to recruit for MM Tech Buyouts / GE Firms. Unsure on the difficulty of modeling tests. Can currently do PF L5 with a template, and am planning on learning how to do up to L5 from scratch.

Little unsure if this is overkill / not good use of time (as opposed to working on other interview aspects / questions). 

On the other hand, I'm unsure if I will need to build out a Full 3-Statement (CFS included, Pro Forma BS Included) for MM Tech.

Any advice or insight would be greatly appreciated.

4 Comments
 

When it comes to preparing for MM Tech Buyouts or Growth Equity (GE) firms, here's what you need to know based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Modeling Test Difficulty:

    • For middle-market (MM) tech buyouts and GE firms, the modeling tests are generally less complex than those for large-cap private equity firms. However, they still require a solid understanding of financial modeling fundamentals.
    • You’re unlikely to need to build a full 3-statement model from scratch during the test. Instead, expect tasks like:
      • Building a simple LBO model.
      • Adjusting a pre-built model (e.g., tweaking assumptions or adding a sensitivity analysis).
      • Creating a Pro Forma Balance Sheet or Cash Flow Statement adjustments.
  2. Proficiency Level:

    • Being able to handle PF L5 with a template is a good start. However, learning to build up to L5 from scratch is a valuable skill, especially if you’re targeting firms that emphasize technical skills. It’s not overkill but should be balanced with other prep areas.
  3. Time Allocation:

    • While technical skills are important, don’t neglect other aspects of the interview process:
      • Behavioral Questions: Many MM and GE firms place significant weight on cultural fit and your ability to articulate your story.
      • Case Studies: Some firms may test your ability to analyze a business qualitatively, so practice structuring your thoughts and presenting them clearly.
      • Industry Knowledge: For tech-focused roles, understanding key industry trends, metrics (e.g., ARR, churn, LTV/CAC), and drivers is crucial.
  4. Recommendation:

    • Strike a balance. Dedicate time to mastering LBO models and Pro Forma adjustments, but also ensure you’re well-prepared for behavioral and case-based questions.
    • If you’re short on time, focus on the most common tasks for MM firms: tweaking pre-built models, sensitivity analysis, and understanding key business drivers.
  5. Resources to Use:

    • The WSO Elite Modeling Package offers courses tailored to mastering LBOs, 3-statement models, and more. It’s a great way to ensure you’re prepared for both technical and practical aspects of the tests.
    • Consider the Private Equity Interview Bootcamp for a focused approach to PE-specific modeling tests and case studies.

In summary, while learning to build models from scratch is a great skill, don’t let it overshadow other critical interview prep areas. A well-rounded approach will maximize your chances of success. Good luck!

Sources: For those of you who worked at a BB that has a separate modeling group (M&A), do you feel like you gain less technical skills?, Technology IB Coverage Group - Exits, Interview Preparation, etc., 7 Practical Buyside Recruiting Tips for IBD Analysts, Q&A: West Coast Tech IB Analyst, Advice for New Analysts Seeking PE Exits

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

Am at a UMM firm doing tech investing, did recruiting in 2022, so take with the usual YMMV. 

PF Level 3 (including BS adjustments) from scratch is more than enough LBO modeling for GE recruiting. The bulk of what I saw in MM/UMM Tech PE interviews was somewhere in that Level 3 to light Level 4 range, not the full PF level 4 but things like projecting revenue using unit economics, or framing cases off market reports, or incorporating some kind of management promote or rollover. I say if you are in a tech banking team and can do a level 3 from scratch in 90 minutes (a lot of the simple 3-statements are 90 minutes and the ones with any complexities are 2 hours), you are in a good spot. 

The bigger pain point for GE interviews, imo, is showing that you actually like sourcing, or at least won’t hate it. For PE, I think I stood out by trying to be thoughtful about why I am interested in the boring B2B software type of companies. Tailor your answers around the boring, recurring-revenue part of tech, because that’s what these firms deploy into.

Edit to summarize: 

I reccomend being able to do PF Level 3 from scratch in~90 minutes and be able to incorporate the complexities I mentioned (revenue bulid off unit economics, coming up with projections based on case-style info on market in question, management rolling over equity as % of equity value, management getting a % of equity proceeds on the exit) within 2 hours. The only thing I missed earlier is make sure you know how to bulid cases (simply use a toggle and offset / choose function for this) for if you ever have any 3 hour long tests. 

 

do you also need to know how to do a customer cube (e.g. cohort analysis, churn) for tech investing growth buyout (later-stage large-cap)?

 

Saepe qui aut nulla deserunt ipsum. Ab aspernatur animi omnis incidunt et minus in odit. Voluptatibus accusamus voluptates velit qui sequi quas consequuntur. Sed fuga in non aliquid rerum quis culpa temporibus. Laboriosam perferendis rerum voluptatem enim magnam nesciunt quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”