PE Exit Opps at VP vs Senior Associate
I’m currently a Senior Associate at a large PE fund in SF. I’m on track for a VP promotion in the next couple of years, but I don’t see myself staying long term given the hours and stress at the VP/Principal level, along with a growing lack of interest in the core work and obsession over details that don't matter.
That leads to a timing question around a potential pivot. My hours are reasonable by PE standards and the comp is strong, so there’s no immediate pressure to leave. At the same time, I’m questioning whether, if PE isn’t the right long-term fit, it makes more sense to pivot sooner and start building experience in something I’m genuinely excited about rather than waiting for a title change.
How meaningfully do exit opportunities differ between leaving as a Senior Associate versus leaving shortly after promotion to VP? Does the incremental experience meaningfully expand the opportunity set, or does it mostly reinforce a PE-specific profile? Based on my experience so far, I’m skeptical that other traditional finance roles would be a materially better fit. I’m therefore leaning toward an operating role, potentially at a startup, but I’m very open to alternative paths or perspectives from people who’ve made similar transitions.
In a similar boat. Following
Following as well
Similar career situation albeit worked in IB for 8 years
I'm looking at Chief of Staff type roles, becoming more common exits here in the UK. Corp dev at acquisitive portcos looks interesting and some of these roles include more 'strategy' type stuff rather than pure transactions. Also seen some VPs leave to join AI start-ups, particularly ones which sell their platforms to the finance industry.
Interested as well (ignore title). My quick take is that after senior associate the role can become less analytical and more quarterbacking / sourcing. So the learning people enter the industry for may start to plateau. I’m leaning towards jumping ship sooner rather than later but curious to hear other thoughts
If anything the role gets more analytical and judgment-driven as you rise, not less. The buck keeps moving closer to you, and the closer it gets the more you're the one who actually has to think about what to do / what to put on pages / how to position the narrative , not just do the required work.
Honestly the quarterbacking is why I enjoy VP more than associate or senior associate, that plus the better hours and the fact that more of the job is the human element of relationships and interacting with stakeholders. At a lean team it's a jack-of-all-trades role, which is in my view pretty interesting and a spot where you can learn a lot, more so than as an associate. At the large public MFs, including my former employer where a lot of my friends are still there, it's the opposite: VP is the first rung in a long ladder where you're a very well-paid corporate bureaucrat. Not knocking it, the cash comp is great and the life is cushy and low-risk. It's just a less interesting job than the same title at a leaner shop.
It certainly makes a difference if you want to do anything in the M&A world. True "deal quarterback" experience is valuable and probably the number one thing that separates the tenure levels you highlighted. Most PE shops would be happy to hire an ex-VP as a portco Head of Corp Dev, but an ex-Senior Associate isn't getting that look.
If outside the deals world, I'd say best to move after 2-3 years. Plenty of jobs requiring 5 YOE where hiring managers are just optimizing for "smart, coachable, vaguely relevant experience." Above that, unless you're willing to take a hit on seniority, needs get much more specific.
Agree with this entirely. Also, if you ever decide you want to go back to PE, having had the VP title is important (otherwise you'll get pushed to Senior Associate roles)
What TC comp are you expecting in corporate roles? I am a SR associate meagfund, is it fair to expect $250k-$330k or am I delusional?
Unless you are doing an investing role or potentially something where there will be no WLB (very acquistive, mostly PE backed, corp dev or Chief of Staff at PE companies) with some equity portion, you will very likely not going to be getting that. You will get there if you are a VP+ exiting because the roles at offer are VP of Corp Dev and VP of Strat Fin, but you are not getting those looks as a Senior Assoicate. This is based solely off of cold outreach as haven't really thought about pursuing corporate roles. For reference, I did my assoicate and senior assoicate stint at a MF and now at a UMM as VP.
I think conventional wisdom is that you're best served making it to VP before exiting. There's something about the VP title in finance that serves as a "stamp of approval" from your organization.
**However**, speaking from experience, it only gets harder to leave. Your skillset -- and the skillset sought by the people hiring you -- becomes more bespoke, you're deemed less "moldable", and there are fewer job openings generally. You'll also get pickier, and you'll also get suck with "golden handcuffs" at your current role.
My two cents is that everyone should do their 2-4 years of IB/PE, then head in a straight line to what they actually want to do long-term.
I'll also add that this is a decent analogy for marriage.. you don't want to commit to being a "lifer" too early.. but you sure don't want to wait too long either..
Thanks, helpful responses
Reprehenderit doloribus dolor nemo enim eum consectetur labore. Incidunt sit sunt quos non maxime. In non id quisquam suscipit alias eaque. Hic blanditiis mollitia veniam dicta unde.
Ipsam adipisci fugiat quam nisi in et excepturi. Nesciunt et occaecati inventore cumque soluta ipsa. Voluptatem aut iusto ex repellat illo. Ducimus voluptate consectetur facilis. Omnis voluptatem et dolor praesentium molestias. Eum unde dolores itaque molestias ut et id.
Quisquam quaerat facilis id et qui sequi numquam. Eaque non facilis ipsam aut. Perspiciatis similique voluptatibus illum autem mollitia.
Incidunt ut doloremque ad ad. Ipsam quia animi sed corporis odio fugit eveniet. Repellat distinctio qui cupiditate ea. At in repudiandae laboriosam ea. Dolorem fugit voluptas doloribus repellat eum. Culpa expedita quae illo iusto ipsum. Eum aut ea aliquam ut et illo repudiandae.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...