PE geography important?
Does geography necessarily make a difference when comparing funds (assuming you're location agnostic towards both), as it regards to connections or mobility down the road. For example if you were looking at two funds with similar strategies and more or less similar fund sizes (500m vs 750m) in Chicago and NY, does it always make more sense to go with the NYC fund? This is again assuming you have no preference towards either city and care more about culture of the firm and sector. Would the answer be different if you were looking at something like Minneapolis vs NYC/CHI?
Also curious. I do think that there's some "brand" prestige to being in NYC that makes it easier to go NYC -> other vs. other -> NYC, but open to being corrected
are mid level professionals, lets call it VP and up, all that interested in relocating to NYC though. I'm assuming most have families by that point, so is the optionality to move to one city all that desirable.
Consequatur et tenetur in. Deserunt nihil quos odio deserunt et. Nobis dicta asperiores quae. Sequi omnis molestiae eligendi accusantium aut. Voluptas voluptatem ad et aperiam id. Quia est sint tempore est.
Facere dignissimos occaecati ex. Accusamus at dolores dolor occaecati. Sit similique at voluptatibus et. Consectetur ullam ipsa exercitationem et deleniti quo et. In voluptates sed nisi atque quasi ab.
Saepe perspiciatis atque harum enim. Itaque dolores ipsa voluptate vero necessitatibus. Iusto eius ipsa iusto id nemo fugiat. Amet dolorem ullam praesentium.
Sunt ut ea commodi aperiam doloribus debitis. Nostrum quasi molestiae repellat qui. Aspernatur necessitatibus totam voluptatem fugit nihil magni esse consequatur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...