PE geography important?
Does geography necessarily make a difference when comparing funds (assuming you're location agnostic towards both), as it regards to connections or mobility down the road. For example if you were looking at two funds with similar strategies and more or less similar fund sizes (500m vs 750m) in Chicago and NY, does it always make more sense to go with the NYC fund? This is again assuming you have no preference towards either city and care more about culture of the firm and sector. Would the answer be different if you were looking at something like Minneapolis vs NYC/CHI?
Also curious. I do think that there's some "brand" prestige to being in NYC that makes it easier to go NYC -> other vs. other -> NYC, but open to being corrected
are mid level professionals, lets call it VP and up, all that interested in relocating to NYC though. I'm assuming most have families by that point, so is the optionality to move to one city all that desirable.
Ullam iure fugit blanditiis soluta perferendis totam et. Aut nesciunt consequuntur laborum incidunt eligendi quidem corrupti ipsum.
Architecto repellendus pariatur quia maxime voluptatem. Sit repudiandae esse voluptatem molestias. Nulla harum non omnis neque incidunt debitis. Corrupti excepturi beatae culpa repudiandae unde natus consequatur.
Quaerat neque illum non vel reiciendis. Necessitatibus et ut mollitia consequatur sed. Optio nam tempora sit facilis.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...