PE-held ~7 years, near-sale fell apart — stay or walk?

I’m at a PE-backed company held ~7 years. We were very close to a sale last year, but the deal fell apart late due to employee equity treatment, not price.

Now the message is IPO-readiness, but realistically 2+ years out, and there’s no public filing yet. Many employee equity holders are effectively locked in — leaving means forfeiting meaningful upside.

For those who’ve been here before:

If you stayed through a delayed exit, did it pay off?

If you left, do you regret it?

Appreciate any real-world perspective.

13 Comments
 

I have not personally been in this position, but have spoken to dozens that have over the years. There is no right answer. It's 50-50 on regretting staying vs. regretting leaving. 

Know a CFO that gave up a $15M payday by leaving 6 months too early. Know a CEO who wasted an extra 4 years and left after year 9 with no outcome. 

You'll have to run the math on how much you're giving up, what opportunities you have in hand elsewhere, and the likelihood your equity outperforms elsewhere.

 

Wow.  9 years is painful.  How often does PE hold that long?  I'd think the LPs would be getting restless. 

Unfortunately, at my age, I'm not currently considering other opportunities.  Retirement is my next gig.  Which makes this all the more painful.  

 
Most Helpful

At a MF, we have a portco we’ve been holding for close to 8 years. LPs aren’t thrilled, but they’re generally okay with it given the broader fund context we’ve returned north of a 2.5x net at the fund level, the company’s value has been compounding at a steady ~10% annually, and it represents 5% of total fund capital.

The original underwrite was obviously a ~5-year hold, but COVID and some business-specific disruptions pushed timelines. That said, LPs were relatively understanding given performance elsewhere in the portfolio and the fact that we’ve been well past IRR hurdles for a while.

At this point, the partners are comfortable letting it run, especially since a liquidity event is expected within the next 12–18 months. Any incremental value creation essentially drops straight to carry, and the LPs are aware of it.

Obviously this isn’t always the preferred outcome but just trying to give an anecdote 

 

Happens a lot more than you think, even in assets that are performing well. Often it is fund level conditions that determine a sponsor's desperation to exit. 

Maybe they have several other winners they can point to that will simplify their next fundraise. So the sponsor can optimize MoM for real carry dollars over IRR. It's usually the inverse where a good deal needs to exit too early to make up ground for poorer performers.

 

Interesting. I would stay at this stage imo assuming only other move is retirement

 

What do you mean by "the deal fell apart late due to employee equity treatment?" Not sure I'm following but understanding whether it was at all driven by company performance will be important before giving advice here. If performance is declining and the outlook isn't great, suggest looking at other opportunities. Otherwise you're potentially in for some tough years ahead and no guarantee that the company can rebound in time for the PE firm to realize a profit that would make your MIP worth something.

 

Some of this might depend on your status and reputation within the company and your relationship with both management & sponsor. If you are relatively senior, well thought of, liked and respected by mgmt and sponsor, there is potentially a path forward of you approaching them with your concerns and working out something compensation wise. 

 

Quo quisquam qui nobis. In odit totam repellat animi animi eos. Temporibus maiores porro sunt. Magni corrupti aut id dolores ut similique. Recusandae tempore atque ut et dolore omnis. Hic molestias perspiciatis ut vel necessitatibus nesciunt quis. Est aliquid error ipsa odit.

Saepe qui dolorum autem consequatur culpa veniam. Vero similique perspiciatis recusandae porro qui illum.

Ducimus neque in quisquam quaerat sit reprehenderit et. Sit dolores sit cumque provident. Ipsa labore deserunt beatae. Impedit quis est architecto perspiciatis provident dolores. Nam dolorem repudiandae non veritatis necessitatibus expedita quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”