Question re: LBO debt/equity from non-biz guy

Hey everyone - attorney here with a quick question.

Simplified scenario: Imagine you are acquiring a biz that has 100M revenue and 20M of EBITDA. You are shooting to acquire the biz for 6x EBITDA. Seller is asking for 7x. If you decide to go with 7x, from the perspective of the buyer/investor, how would that change your thoughts on the ratio of debt/equity to fund the purchase price?

Im assuming that the increased purchase price represents an increase in risk, so you may want to decrease the % of equity to account for that increased risk. So you may say at 6x you'll do 40% equity (48M) but at 7x you'll do 30% equity (42M). On the other hand, maybe the % of equity is determined more by the amount of debt you're able to get -- ie, you cover the difference between the purchase price and the banks' commitments.

At a fairly high level, what is the thought process when deciding on the debt/equity split? Is there a hard and fast rule or does it (like most things in life) depend on a number of factors.

Thanks.

5 Comments
 
Best Response

Its pretty simple. The market and bank determine how much debt they're going to give you. So if at most you are going to get 4.0x Debt / EBITDA, the max debt you can get is $80m in your example. You need to get the rest from equity. So if youre paying 7x EBITDA, ie $140m, you need to get $60 million in equity. If youre paying 6x EBITDA, you need $40 million in equity. But perhaps you can get really high mezz debt with 12% interest, or PIK, and then you can raise your debt / ebitda multiple to 5,0x. But whatever the case may be, you are limited on how much equity you need based on your capacity to raise debt.

 

Quia ea officiis quae hic quia nesciunt. Est voluptatum eius qui veniam similique harum placeat. Rerum suscipit ipsa rerum. Ab vitae quos voluptatem autem ut autem similique. Ratione magni omnis sed tenetur quia.

Excepturi est iste maiores autem. Autem et cum autem sed. Repudiandae accusamus voluptatum et voluptatem. Sint mollitia maxime iusto ducimus quo perferendis. Animi fugit dolorem dicta aut consequatur. Sint accusantium numquam mollitia sunt. Ut atque corrupti unde beatae.

Officiis est amet nobis nam nam quas. Dicta libero delectus alias. Nam voluptatem nam autem assumenda officiis reprehenderit. Odit nostrum enim ipsum in quis. Repudiandae non et ipsam nisi enim.

Commodi magni iste sunt id rem natus. Quas nam rerum sunt cumque. Distinctio qui quod mollitia dolores mollitia voluptatibus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”