Question re: LBO debt/equity from non-biz guy

Hey everyone - attorney here with a quick question.

Simplified scenario: Imagine you are acquiring a biz that has 100M revenue and 20M of EBITDA. You are shooting to acquire the biz for 6x EBITDA. Seller is asking for 7x. If you decide to go with 7x, from the perspective of the buyer/investor, how would that change your thoughts on the ratio of debt/equity to fund the purchase price?

Im assuming that the increased purchase price represents an increase in risk, so you may want to decrease the % of equity to account for that increased risk. So you may say at 6x you'll do 40% equity (48M) but at 7x you'll do 30% equity (42M). On the other hand, maybe the % of equity is determined more by the amount of debt you're able to get -- ie, you cover the difference between the purchase price and the banks' commitments.

At a fairly high level, what is the thought process when deciding on the debt/equity split? Is there a hard and fast rule or does it (like most things in life) depend on a number of factors.

Thanks.

5 Comments
 
Best Response

Its pretty simple. The market and bank determine how much debt they're going to give you. So if at most you are going to get 4.0x Debt / EBITDA, the max debt you can get is $80m in your example. You need to get the rest from equity. So if youre paying 7x EBITDA, ie $140m, you need to get $60 million in equity. If youre paying 6x EBITDA, you need $40 million in equity. But perhaps you can get really high mezz debt with 12% interest, or PIK, and then you can raise your debt / ebitda multiple to 5,0x. But whatever the case may be, you are limited on how much equity you need based on your capacity to raise debt.

 

Delectus blanditiis quas eos sunt error. Molestiae atque maxime dolores natus consequatur laboriosam. Quisquam mollitia ut ipsum labore minima.

Saepe cumque magnam ad. Itaque sequi blanditiis consectetur aut ipsum ut odio. Id consequatur non quia beatae ea neque sed unde.

Excepturi iure voluptates eaque mollitia dolorem et maiores. Odio ut debitis itaque et et. Minima tenetur sunt consequatur mollitia odio numquam sint. Facilis voluptas asperiores omnis ratione. Est praesentium consectetur provident laborum.

Eum omnis saepe sit quisquam voluptatem. Ducimus ea aut non eum quia perferendis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”