Successful Senior PE Guy: Net Worth

Saw a thread under the IB forum, and thought it'd be interesting to put a PE twist on it-- 

Let's say by the grace of god, not only did you stick around long enough to make partner, but you also had the tenacity and grit to grind the early partner years out and not get fired. You've now had 7 - 10 years of steady deal flow under your belt. The last 5 years have ramped quite considerably, and you find yourself putting in increasingly less effort / hours but, every year, you're doing the most business you've ever done.

You're not Steve Schwarzman or Leon Black, you're a successful private equity investor. How much are you worth today? How much could you be worth when all is said and done?

Credit to iggs99988 for the idea. 

28 Comments
 

Around $20mm nw at that point. Could become a billionaire if decide to continue, but likely take the foot off the gas pedal I'd imagine. 

Money can purchase freedom, if you have the guts to buy it
 
Most Helpful

You can do this math very easily.

In a spreadsheet have rows showing Year, Age, Title, Base+Bonus.

Start at year 2005, 24 years old, title Associate, Base+Bonus = $300k (not what '05 comp was, but lets just to illustrate on 2020 dollars)

Have 2 years of Associate, step up comp by $50k per year

Have 2 years in MBA, comp –$125k per year

1st Post-MBA year Sr. Associate, Comp $500k

4 years as VP, 4 years as Principal, 4 years as Partner/MD; every year step-up comp $50k as VP, $75k as Principal, $100k as MD/Partner

Next layer in fundraises and carry allocations.  Take Blackstone or KKR financial supplement in their earnings reports to layer in the PE fund raises.

Use Heidrick and Struggles PE comp report that is floating around all over the place to allocate carry in each fund based on the reference carry allocation for whatever your strawman's title is in the year the fund was raised.  Use the actual reported MOIC figure per fund (probably in the ~1.5x MOIC zip code) to determine the carry pool (Fund Size x (MOIC - 1) x 20%) and then apply your allocated carry % to that fund carry pool to determine the payout.  If any given fund is low returning, it may be below the hurdle, but lets keep it simple.

That should frame the cash comp (Base+Bonus) and the carry component.  I'd amortize a fund's carry across 5-7 years, just to smooth it out.  You'll get an appreciation for how successive carry allocations stack and scale over time and how the blended "total comp" scales over time.  I'd assume you live off your base and bonus and carry payout is your "net worth".

The $20mm net worth by the time you make partner and becoming a billionaire by retirement if you "don't take your foot off the gas" is nonsense.  No one is making $1bn in this industry anymore, maybe a handful of people with complete outlier paths.  The idea that you make $20mm in the first 20 years of your career, and another $980mm in the last 15 is ridiculous.  I've heard megafund partners pitch partner track recruits that they can expect to have lifetime earnings of $75-100mm, and conventional wisdom is that this is a very aggressive marketing since (1) your longevity is by no means a given; (2) the absolute dollar value itself includes a fair amount of marketing spin/inflation, and is backward looking, meanwhile future of industry reflects lower comp, fee compression, and returns compression.

This is a very loose strawman framework; the dispersion around this outcome is quite broad.

 

While I was in MM PE, a lot of Partners were "rumored" to have ~$50MM retirement hurdles. Founders obviously were already worth much, much more. 

 
gufmo

While I was in MM PE, a lot of Partners were "rumored" to have ~$50MM retirement hurdles. Founders obviously were already worth much, much more. 

Basically the same at my MM fund. Wanted to confirm that this was more common, and now I know 

 

Haha I love how people on here think that by staying in PE you can make an easy billion. 

First of all, most people don't make it up to Partner at the big funds where the carry $$ can be big. It's just too crowded at the top. As a Principal at a decently sized shop, you might be able to pull a few million a year, but there's taxes and that money can be variable depending on the carry.

Most folks end up leaving and going to smaller shops where the comp is lower and there's theoretically more upside, but at a young, relatively small shop, it will also take a lot of time, luck, and skill to make big money.

The "easiest" way to make a ton of money is to run your own fund and grow it enough to where you manage a few billion in AUM. Depending on how good of an investor you are, determines how much money you can make. If/when you make a few hundred million on a deal or a fund, you're keeping a significant majority of that. The VPs/Principals are getting crumbs compared to what you can command. That's how the big money is ultimately made. 

Same goes for anything, you really only start making big money if you're the owner of something.

 

Short answer is as much as you want, but a ballpark of around ~70% is probably fair. All comes down to how generous the partner is and who they surround themselves with. Also depends on size of fund and how you have to incentivize employees. If you're a small fund and thus small AUM, you might have to give more carry away to offset for lower comp. If you go in with a group of senior folks, that's also going to lower the carry. If you care about keeping people happy and promoting from within, that also eats up carry. I generally think that ballpark carry for VPs is 1% or so, assume associates get nothing and maybe SAs get half of that. Principals maybe 2-3% and junior partners ~5%+. Again, these are super ballpark figures, you can go poke around the H&S comp report if you want to get more certainty, but it depends so much on fund size I would get too caught up in that. So think of a hypothetical 20 person investment shop, a few partners, a few principles, some VPs, and then the more junior folks. You could keep a lionshare of the carry on pretty significant dollars if you did well. Again...all much easier said than done.

8.5.2
 

If someone's worked in the PE industry and survived for 20+ years, I'd say $50mn nw easily. One of my close friend's dad is a senior partner at a FoF (yes fund of funds) that was founded in 2001 and that manages about $11bn today. I'm not sure how much he's worth but he donated $100mn to his alma mater few years back, and his family only fly on private jet. I bet a senior partner at a "buyout fund" would do much better.  

 

Not much to add on the subject, but just note that one's "net worth" can be derived from a variety of factors: inheritance, performance of PA, house appreciation, etc. If a current senior partner has been in PE for 30+ years (meaning they joined wall street in the 1970s-80s when wall street used to be much more of an old boys club), their parents probably were wealthy and left a sizable inheritance. Their PA compounded through one of the biggest bull markets in history. Assuming they bought an NYC townhouse in the 1970s/1980s, it could have appreciated 10x. Etc. Just because someone owns a $20mm townhouse or donates $X doesn't mean the funds were derived from their PE income

 

Eius deserunt doloremque eum est. Quia non id qui. Sit dolores molestias unde aliquam assumenda eligendi. Rerum nesciunt placeat pariatur nostrum. Et omnis quos nisi debitis eum. Quo repellendus dicta eveniet.

Quia hic et omnis. Inventore sint occaecati voluptatum cumque. Animi earum doloremque neque est natus assumenda. Omnis impedit et ut laboriosam corrupti. Deleniti distinctio eos et ab iste ut ratione ipsam. Laboriosam dolores rerum officiis excepturi ut dolor.

Beatae laboriosam mollitia mollitia. Adipisci est ex et. Omnis recusandae quasi id ea et a distinctio. Reprehenderit sed sunt aspernatur culpa adipisci libero.

Velit fugit ipsam qui omnis veritatis. Ducimus laborum qui aut alias perspiciatis sed. Quisquam quia aperiam aspernatur molestiae. Nobis consequuntur quibusdam dicta voluptates veniam excepturi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”