Value PE --> Growth Equity
Just wanted to know if PE associates at value-oriented funds also switch to growth equity / PE funds? Would the other way around be easier / harder? Or will being either pigeonhole you?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +29 | Imposter Syndrome: PE to Publics | 4 | 5d |
| +26 | Blank | 15 | 1d |
| +26 | Ares buying LGP...now what? | 8 | 4d |
| +22 | Committing to CD&R? | 15 | 2h |
| +19 | Hours at MF Infra Funds in London | 4 | 1d |
| +19 | Do PE VPs Always Have An Associate Under Them? | 12 | 4d |
| +18 | GTCR vs BDT MSD vs MDP | 16 | 3d |
| +14 | London Version: PE Check-in on Attrition, Promotions and State of Play | 6 | 3d |
| +12 | Which PE funds are actually great investors | 1 | 3d |
| +9 | Ares Acquisition of LGP | 0 | 6d |
Career Resources
Switching from a value-oriented private equity fund to a growth equity or growth-oriented PE fund is indeed possible, but it comes with its own set of challenges and considerations:
Skill Transferability: The skills you acquire in a value-oriented fund, such as deep financial analysis and operational improvement strategies, are valuable but might need to be adapted. Growth equity often focuses more on scaling businesses and less on turnaround situations, which might require a shift in approach.
Network and Reputation: Your ability to switch might also depend on your network within the industry and your reputation. Building relationships with professionals in growth equity can facilitate such a transition.
Cultural Fit: Growth equity environments can be different from value-oriented PE funds. They might focus more on technology-driven markets or companies at different stages of maturity, which could require an adjustment in working style and expectations.
Learning Curve: There will be a learning curve as the focus shifts from value preservation and enhancement to identifying high-growth opportunities. This might require additional training or self-education in market trends and growth strategies.
Pigeonholing Concerns: While there is a risk of being typecast into one type of investment strategy, many professionals successfully transition by leveraging their core investment skills and learning the nuances of the new area.
In terms of which transition is easier, it often depends on the individual's adaptability, existing skills, and the specific opportunities available. Generally, moving from a scenario where you have broader exposure to different strategies (like in some growth equity roles) might provide more versatility, but this is not a hard and fast rule.
Sources: Stereotypes for PE associates at each of the megafunds, Value Buy-out vs Growth Buy-out Discussion from Associate Perspective, IB or PE has easier upward mobility? Compensation?, Hedge Fund or PE Analysts Program, Role of a Growth Equity Associate
Bump
Unfortunately cannot help you, but I'm curious to know what are the typical strategies for value oriented PE investors. I get the strategy for value investors in public equities, but how does it work in PE? Do you focus on improving the performance through turnarounds?
Quidem tempora quia repudiandae molestiae aut. Eum alias debitis sed quis. Enim necessitatibus deleniti impedit vero. Et voluptates corrupti fugit tempore porro. Est rerum et ea est.
Nesciunt debitis maxime et ut. Eaque aperiam sit nam minima dicta quasi voluptatem rerum. Unde fuga nulla est aperiam eaque. Nostrum est odit deleniti nam ratione voluptate quam. Incidunt sed ipsam repudiandae nam sed temporibus. Autem in consectetur excepturi nulla quidem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...