Venture Debt in 2022 = adverse selection risk?

Testing a hypothesis here. I think we'll see carnage in VC, particularly in older vintage funds. A lot of startups won't be able to raise equity rounds and will die. Granted, there's still a lot of dry powder to be allocated. But in general VCs and non-traditional investors are more selective.

Enter Venture Debt funds as non-dilutive alternative to equity. I've heard from the street that deal flow is booming and fundraising is going better than VC. Sounds amazing, but what if the startups who need that funding are the worst capitalized ones i.e. adverse selection risk?

A big part of VD returns come from the equity kicker triggered in events like M&A, equity rounds etc. which can bump returns to >20% IRR. But if they don't materialize then you're just taking venture risk for 10-15% IRR or less.

Am I missing something? Thanks in advance for your contributions

8 Comments
 

Like the other commenter said — structured capital as an alternative to typical equity raises are more commonplace now for early stage businesses that don’t want to raise down-rounds.

The adverse selection problem we’re seeing in the market at the moment primarily applies to investing in equity. If you’re a not a capital efficient company with great metrics, you’re neither getting access to equity financing nor venture debt. On the other hand, if you’re a great startup you probably don’t want equity financing right now, but you’ll have good access to structured credit and avoid dilution🪜

 
Most Helpful

Nothing wrong with structured equity in VC but pure debt in the 10-14% PIK range is too low of a return profile for VC, even with warrants and a low LTV. I've seen some Venture Debt funds provide 10% LTVs to companies for a fixed 10-12% PIKloan over 2 years with no minimum MoC or prepay penalty. Lots of VC collateral now isn't that heathly so a 10% LTV could look more like 50% if you truly mark to market. I am currently buying equity in VC (direct secondaries) for 10-25% of last round so why would I want to take a 10% LTV to have capped returns and all the risk? I think it's a bullshit strategy.

 

Who would those be?

What are your thoughts on VD versus structured equity? The latter seems less controversial and maybe has more career stability.

 

Neque commodi laborum qui facilis necessitatibus neque laboriosam voluptatem. Non illum id voluptate ducimus similique.

Sint occaecati explicabo ab omnis corrupti adipisci aut. Aspernatur magnam aspernatur error eaque sit reiciendis quod quibusdam. Exercitationem ut eos sint aspernatur dolores facere assumenda.

Eum facere rerum at. Labore similique enim accusantium voluptas.

Molestiae sed officia nihil ipsam voluptatem. Qui qui et ut expedita laboriosam repellendus placeat. Ullam minima facere ut architecto. Eos commodi quis cum ab neque qui eos quisquam. Laborum voluptatum repellat molestias ut eaque tempore quos. Dolores similique et fugiat libero repellat. Aut a minima sed placeat.

 

Expedita culpa nisi quos. Praesentium autem odit non est dolores tempora. Voluptate sunt voluptas repudiandae nam ex officiis. Vero quasi adipisci autem ut neque eveniet magni. Non aut voluptatem aliquam quis enim. Quis praesentium sed maxime quasi facilis at similique. Repellat dolore incidunt itaque ut.

Numquam dolor similique perferendis occaecati et mollitia aut exercitationem. Quidem consectetur ut voluptatibus facilis quo voluptate eaque. Deleniti aliquam quis nostrum enim ea suscipit. Voluptates ad quas autem dolorem omnis officia neque. Sequi consequatur ea ab et et ea similique velit. Ipsam illo molestias sed libero. Consectetur molestiae ut aut quaerat neque quasi.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”