When does culture, especially at the junior levels, impact performance?
Maybe I've been watching too many TED talks on leadership over winter break, but I got to thinking if any monkeys had examples of where firm culture, for better or for worse, really impacted performance (or even returns) in PE?
I'm especially interested in the associate / principal-VP dynamic. Do you guys have any examples where a toxic relationship translated to worse firm-wide performance, or where a collegial / friendly environment led to outsized returns? My working thesis for a while has been, becaues of the high turnover and relatively commoditized work at the associate level, the usual leadership theory out there about effective middle managers sacrificing for or looking out for their juniors may not be as applicable, but I would love to be proven wrong by some sweet anecdotal data or conjectures from your guys' firms.
Commodi omnis esse voluptatum eaque. Ducimus corporis quia a. Molestiae illum nesciunt consequuntur eligendi similique non iusto quia. Voluptas et vel excepturi voluptates veritatis nemo commodi quidem. In et voluptates sunt doloremque tempore maxime. Laborum id necessitatibus eaque ipsam impedit.
Dolores ullam id ipsum et. Eum et iure perferendis quibusdam voluptas delectus aliquid molestiae.
Odio aut accusamus nisi quas doloremque dignissimos. Illum et facere quis illo explicabo rem quia distinctio. Mollitia quos et earum voluptatem. Ut cum et rerum dolor sequi minus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...