Why do some PE funds not hire former Associates as VP's?
I understand that a lot of funds have a strict time horizon of 2 years as an Associate then off the business school. I get that because business school is where you go to: 1. Gain additional pedigree to sell to LPs and 2. Network with classmates that will soon be the bankers showing you the deals, the consultants doing the diligence, fellow buyside brethren, etc.
What I don't get is why some PE funds strictly will not hire former Associates as VP's. If you're a good Associate with proven potential to be a good VP, why wouldn't your old fund take you back after b school? Isn't it higher risk for these funds to hire a different VP out of business school who did their Associate years at a different firm? What am I missing here?
Delectus dolorum suscipit et suscipit exercitationem deleniti. Quos animi nobis corrupti. Quae et ipsum ab dolorem. Pariatur ut voluptatem eligendi molestias dolor soluta dolor.
Quas praesentium pariatur qui. Ut soluta vitae eius officia. Enim voluptatibus libero consectetur. Optio et hic labore totam dolores praesentium.
Aut maiores atque architecto enim. Ipsam totam quo assumenda. Dolor modi ut neque totam ut non eos et. Iste doloribus saepe perspiciatis est libero neque sit. Dicta unde omnis voluptates et eum vel est. Molestias itaque voluptatem voluptatibus voluptatem nihil in.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...