Why it's not a bad time to go into PE "the good ol days aren't over"

Fund sizes continue to rapidly increase and while returns are compressing, dollar gain and AUM per head is increasing and so net comp to you as a GP is up. Yes it's unlikely to found a fund today and become the next Schwarzman since the industry is too mature but for 99.9% of us who want to be a partner at a good fund and retire, it's never been better. I don't care if IRRs are 15% as long as i'm deploying huge checks and doubling my money. Comp has never been higher, fund raising never better. The yield compression in all sectors helped PE and with rates rising you'll see some slowdown of inflows but this still remains one of the best sectors of investment for trillions in dry powder LPs have been nursing. LPs have basically been unable to create in house PE since in the US they are legally unable to pay market comp and in Canada/Europe it's politically unpalatable. Only Asian/Middle Eastern funds can and they have trouble capturing share in the US market and can just do co-invests anyway. Fantastic industry and great time to be in it. Your bosses may yearn for the easy 3x days in the 90s but ultimately check sizes and fund sizes were tiny. I'd take a 2x on a 1bn check any day over a 3x on a 100m check. 

 
Most Helpful

I think this is basically right. Even harder to make fuck you money in PE these days but for there’s enough structural support in place that the industry will exist and expand and pay well for a while. 
 

The problem now is that it’s less clear cut whether it’s the best next step after IBD vs. staying on the sellside or doing something else. The potential for outsize comp is just less likely and on a risk adjusted basis, you’re likely to come out ahead in banking solely on base/bonus. Since PE firms don’t have the public visibility / big company PR machine, the lifestyle perks banks are trying to implement aren’t likely to make their way over either, so the lifestyle is arguably worse in some cases. The work itself can be more interesting and it’s a lot more gratifying to sell a portco than close a deal, but on the flip side there’s way less minutia you care about in banking and you’re more focused on the big picture strategy and markets. 

 

Another point I think bringing up for analysts considering PE is opportunities - I personally want to go a top MBA (Stanford/HBS), and think that joining a top MF gives me a better chance of doing so.

Versus working in banking for 2 more years at a mid-tier BB with an okay brand name won’t really give me that option.

Also I know that PE isn’t necessarily better than banking, but the past few weeks have been absolutely brutal for me with unrealistic client requests creating crazy amounts of work in extremely short periods of time. At least in PE you have slightly more control over what gets done when. And looking to buy companies seems way more interesting that constantly outputting pages for clients and random bullshit decks that never result in anything/barely get looked at.

 

I plan to pick my PE firm based on HBS and GSB placement and ik many others that are too. Getting an MBA is just overhated on this forum and many people want to get one.

 

No reason other than wanting to go to a particular school. My parents really emphasized how great bschool was when I was growing up (they met there, all their closest friends are from bschool) and how it was a great was to take 2 years off and reset your mental about work/pivot to something else. I also went to a small college and didn’t have the most amazing experience, so the thought of spending 2 more years with smart/like minded people sound great to me.

Also, I feel like all I’ve been worrying about it achieving things on paper (i.e. landing great BB/PE roles) to prove to myself/others I can do it, but then afterwards I think I would like to own my own business/go do something I am more interested in.

 

I'm kind of curious, but how much would rising rates affect PE? Wouldn't debt getting more expensive make it harder to generate alpha and also maybe create more "winners curse" scenarios where there are fewer viable targets with more capital trying to outbid each other for them? I don't work in PE directly, but the consulting I do often supports them, so that's why I'm kind of curious how, assuming higher rates relative to last decade are now the norm, these fed hikes would affect the industry as a whole. 

 

Leverage doesn't generate alpha, it just enhances it if it exists in the first place, so debt being more expensive doesn't really change that side of things. In fact, I think it may be easier for PE funds to outperform public markets in a high rate environment (much easier to do so when the benchmark isn't 25%+). 

I tend to agree with OP. There are significant tailwinds for alternative investment strategies such as PE. If anything, I think we might just see a shift from growth, which has been the most successful style over the past decade, to more emphasis on value investing. 

 

What happens when IRRs drift down to 11-12%? Entire fee structure and liquidity premium is thrown into question. Definitely still will have some good seats but will comp be what it is today on avg? Hours worked isn’t going down materially. So the ratio is not great. Esp with likes of Cathie Wood’s vehicles disrupting the private markets, would’nt be surprised if LBO funds are also attacked similarly. But at very least VC / growht equity is also seeing falling returns 

maybe you have answers for this but these are some of the things I’d question 

 

? Completely theoretical because that’s not where returns are and there are many scenarios in which it might happen where the funds still easily earn their fee - it’s about outperformance of the market at any particular time, not about some set level of returns at any moment in time 

 

Est ut facere quia et ut dolore sit nam. Ut iste architecto voluptatem blanditiis error in. Assumenda odio quis suscipit deleniti blanditiis nesciunt fugiat. Quia optio vitae sed beatae molestias. Eum quod similique ratione sequi ea est occaecati. Ducimus est delectus aut id accusamus minus asperiores.

Fuga quos distinctio qui voluptas porro illum. Repellat qui architecto labore ut. Voluptates consequatur doloribus et harum sapiente.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”