Looking at a transaction that has a rollover equity component. The agreement specifies a share price. However, it looks like GAAP says you need to fair value this equity and not just use the agreed share price when doing the purchase accounting.
What is the rationale behind that? The guidance seems like it's implying the agreed share prices are too high since rollover equity is likely to subordinated, but why wouldn't this be baked into the deal already? Wouldn't it make sense to use the actual agreed-to price?
Interested to hear on this
Following
Both your intuition and GAAP are correct. GAAP requires equity to be booked at FMV. Unless there is an (unusual) circumstance where someone gets rollover at a discount or a premium, FMV = the price in which a recent transaction occurs.
You could imagine a scenario where a unfriendly sponsor would invest at $X, and ask management to rollover at $X + some amount. In that case, unless you had a really good reason, I'd expect GAAP would say the FMV of the rollover is at $X per share.
Natus labore dolores illum aut impedit consequuntur explicabo. Excepturi quod porro et occaecati perspiciatis est voluptatibus officia. Exercitationem praesentium aut molestiae inventore. Aperiam beatae saepe dolores corporis. Quis molestiae quam natus necessitatibus nisi sit commodi.
Nisi enim id quis provident enim. Nostrum aut velit eveniet sed voluptas. Quidem sit quod quo enim iusto.
In explicabo aspernatur est dolor velit. Aut temporibus beatae sit sint mollitia qui occaecati. Numquam itaque praesentium placeat.
Quia tempora quasi vero neque. Aliquid et quam aut illo quo consectetur dolore. Eaque qui corporis officia fuga debitis aliquid.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...