WTF is the point of low amort structures in DL/PC/lev lending?

Why not just do interest only? Can someone explain to me the purpose/history or regulatory background of low amortization deals?  Explain it to me like I am an idiot (which I am).  1% of even 2.5% per annum is not materially reducing the commitment and credit risk…so I simply don't understand why the market doesn't shift to I/O deals.  I've seen credit committees squirm and make a fuss over 1.0% of amortization….I mean cmane get a grip fellas.  Are you really going to lose this deal over 100bps of annual amortization?

Additionally, amort tends to causes extreme headache for me as a lender in syndicated deals (or really any deal for that matter).  My operations team simply cannot restrain themselves from reaching out to me every time there is some sort of "issue" and this is exacerbated by large multi lender deals.  However, it is entirely possible that my ops counterparts are just not good at this part of their jobs. Idk

My miniature brain can think of two possible explanations for these dumb low amort structures:

1.  Its just the principle of having the borrower demonstrate the ability to return money to the lenders AND before anybody says "bUt WhAt aBoUt FiXeD ChArGe CoVeRaGe rAtiOs?"

Idk bruh use a different proxy for cash flow as a secondary covenant or who cares since everyone seems to be doing cov-lite these days anyway

or

2. Some lame regulators at the OCC (or wherever the fuck) can sleep better at night with rules requiring a miniscule amount of amort and banks also want to avoid stupid amort-lite designations.   They can't seriously think this is going to keep banks in check.  This also does not explain why non-regulated institutions (e.g., private credit and other direct lenders) still use the same 1% p.a. structures.

Did I just discover the next evolution of mm lending (i.e. no amort)??? Perhaps. If I'm a credit fund, I'd only be offering ginormous unitranches with no amort. I am aware this product already exists, but am questioning why no amort is not prevalent even in non-uni deals.

Did some quick googling and still can't figure it out.  Figured I'd ask you bozos before I ask my director and get terminated on the spot for questioning the sacred 1% p.a. amort convention.

Comments (5)

May 7, 2022 - 7:08pm
Studentofthegame, what's your opinion? Comment below:

Officiis ullam et non labore fugit nihil. Rerum distinctio vel eveniet et quis. Qui qui autem quis cumque sequi illum alias.

Ab asperiores rerum reprehenderit. Delectus qui atque assumenda eos dolor non rem. Accusantium nostrum qui nam dolorem molestias exercitationem. Provident numquam et numquam officia ad. Voluptas voluptas iusto quo nulla voluptas. Eos nostrum voluptas quia corrupti. Adipisci et ducimus laudantium unde voluptatem ad nam molestiae.

Labore numquam necessitatibus enim labore. Molestiae aut et eligendi hic ducimus.

Et quod non molestiae voluptatem consequuntur accusamus blanditiis. Asperiores et et dolorem ducimus iure consequatur.

Start Discussion

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2022 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.4%
  • Apollo Global Management 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.7%
  • Blackstone Group 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2022 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.8%
  • The Riverside Company 98.3%
  • Ardian 97.7%
  • Bain Capital 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2022 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.9%
  • Bain Capital 98.3%
  • Apollo Global Management 97.7%
  • Blackstone Group 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2022 Private Equity

  • Principal (8) $676
  • Director/MD (20) $595
  • Vice President (79) $360
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (81) $273
  • 2nd Year Associate (183) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (346) $226
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (27) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (71) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (210) $120
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $67
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (250) $58