Advice wanted: How to navigate multiple large LP's interested in deal

Have a large niche deal that we have specific expertise in and have 3 fund LP's we know that are interested in potentially working together. I do not have term sheets, and I do not have the deal tied up yet. When submitting an LOI to the seller we would likely not present that we have three groups interested and prefer to just mention one for certainty of execution. Our group is small so for a deal this size we would have to present who our partner is or we are not going to get taken seriously. 

One of the groups we look at a ton of deals with, the other two we have good relationships but not as close. Do we tell them that we are talking to other LP's on this and want a term sheet even though we don't have control (which they know)? Would that make them less interested in pursuing? Best way to handle so we don't blow up a relationship?

Any tips appreciated. 

5 Comments
 

When navigating multiple large LPs interested in a deal, here’s how you can approach the situation based on the most helpful WSO content:

  1. Maintain Certainty of Execution:

    • When submitting the LOI to the seller, it’s wise to present only one LP partner to ensure certainty of execution. Sellers value clarity and confidence in the buyer’s ability to close the deal.
  2. Transparency Without Overexposure:

    • Be transparent with the LPs about the fact that you’re exploring partnerships, but avoid overemphasizing that you’re speaking to multiple groups. Instead, frame it as ensuring the best fit for the deal and your expertise. This approach keeps them engaged without making them feel like they’re in a competitive bidding process.
  3. Leverage Relationships Strategically:

    • Since one of the LPs is a frequent partner, they might be more inclined to move quickly and provide a term sheet. Use this relationship to your advantage while keeping the other two LPs in the loop. Highlight your expertise and the niche nature of the deal to all parties to maintain their interest.
  4. Request Term Sheets Thoughtfully:

    • Asking for term sheets before having control of the deal can be tricky. To avoid making them less interested, position the request as a way to solidify the partnership and demonstrate commitment to the seller. Emphasize that their involvement strengthens the deal’s credibility.
  5. Avoid Damaging Relationships:

    • Be careful not to pit the LPs against each other or create the perception of a bidding war. Instead, focus on aligning interests and ensuring that the partnership is mutually beneficial. Communicate clearly and professionally to maintain trust.
  6. Secure the Deal First:

    • If possible, tie up the deal under your group’s name before finalizing the LP partnership. This gives you more leverage and control in negotiations with the LPs.

By balancing transparency, strategic communication, and leveraging existing relationships, you can navigate this situation without jeopardizing partnerships or the deal itself.

Sources: How do all the smaller GPs handle the funding to closing process?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/deals-death-and-deception-a-bankers-tale?customgpt=1, How to build HF track record that is worth anything?, Sponsor vs LP

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 
Most Helpful

We often tell our repeat GPs that if they feel really good about a deal they should feel free to use our name in the bid process -- that being said we expect them to come to us if they use our name. Recently we had two instances where our partners ultimately went friends and family after getting it under contract -- for better economics -- but we basically let them know short term gain but don't you are now losing favored status. 

I would say do you have existing docs with all of them, if so your economics are going to largely reflect the past deals. If not that is another hurdle, and expense. Is this a true home run? If so look at the top hurdle on your promote. We tend to have a high first hurdle but are happy to give on the top one. So much nuance here that it's hard to give great advice. Be decisive and pick who you have confidence in. A good partnership isn't about squeezing every last dollar, even though we all want that, it's ease of transaction and certainty of being there at closing.

 

If I'm understanding your situation correctly, I do not tell 'pole position' LP about the other backups.  There's really three ultimate scenarios: (1) proceed with pole position LP, (2) proceed with backup LP or (3) don't win deal.  

(1) and (3), you're in clear and don't ruffle feathers regarding exploring other LP's.  In situation (2), before selecting the backup LP, go to pole position LP and insist they sweeten their economics or you'll have to explore backups, which TADA emerges very quickly.  

 

Tempora quia quis et ut beatae. Excepturi ducimus voluptas laborum hic ut. Rerum soluta quia aut placeat veniam.

Eum eum a recusandae doloremque in nesciunt. Exercitationem repudiandae magnam rerum hic vitae magni quo.

Voluptas quia perferendis voluptate dolores rem. Aut aut dolor accusantium consectetur quia aut. Est quo vel rem sapiente incidunt. Minima quo rem cumque incidunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”