Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
Career Resources
WSO Free Modeling Series - Now Open Through
June 30, 2026
9 Free Financial Modeling Lessons
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
+Bonus: Get 27 financial modeling templates in swipe file
High Finance Applications
Guaranteed
Get at least one offer GUARANTEED
- 1:1 support
- 92% success rate
- 2,000+ mentor network
- Unlimited Live bootcamps
- AI for resume + LinkedIn
- Networking automation tools
- HireVue simulation tool
- Full course library
- Private Slack community
- 20hrs of mocks
- + much more...
Bump
What do you want to know? CLOs are a form of securitization which allows the sponsor to create liquidity to recycle capital. CLOs have a predetermined lifespan, usually 5 years, and generally have covenants on the allowable types of collateral, asset mix, leverage levels and reinvestment criteria.
CREFC has a primer on these. Essentially non bank lenders use it as attractive way to clear balance sheet to keep making more loans (historically). If a loan went bad, they’d usually buy it out and put it on a repo line or back on their balance sheet.
Managed deals also gave the issuers flexibility to add new loans into the pools and use them as a partially funded credit line and ramp them up with future loans at set credit criteria (ironically based on their own UW, so pretty easy to game some numbers if you need a home for a loan off BS)
Now with the advent of tighter credit/funding restrictions on Repo lines (and fear of margin calls), coupled with more distress on these transitional properties, you’ll start seeing more specially serviced loans as there’s fewer places to put them.
My thesis is Once a few sponsors bite the bullet on taking losses in the vehicle rather than buying out the assets, the reputational risk is out the door and the loss profiles will start to resemble conduits in time. KBRA had a good study on this in 2022 that essentially confirmed this; in good times issuers did the right thing for investors. now time to see what they’ll do under pressure and with less flexibility.
Those late 2021/2022 vintage 100% MF deals are starting to look a little cuspy.
Nice write up. What kind of loss ratios do you need to see before those are considered impaired? Or how long can sponsors float bad assets before just throwing in the towel via distressed sale or receivership?
Sponsors usually retain the bottom ~20-25% of the securitization as a risk retention piece. The sponsor tranche is usually/mostly unrated so would be very difficult to sell near par if the pool had any sort of impairment. As such, you would think there would be a 25-30%+ tolerance for loss from the sponsor perspective.
Agreed, especially the ones that underwrote stabilized debt yields in the 6s.
Repudiandae sunt recusandae est numquam qui natus aut quo. Officiis ratione vel fugiat voluptatem qui voluptas. Ut eaque quia assumenda omnis. Veritatis ut ad ducimus sunt.
Voluptas unde ex et itaque qui temporibus. Minus neque pariatur debitis reprehenderit.
Ad accusantium aut ut iste aliquam. Omnis iusto quos est ut voluptas ut. Vero quia quis harum nobis molestias qui. Vel fuga quia facere quas voluptatem odit dolorem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...