Anyone take a technical test and gotten rejected afterward?

Took a technical financial modeling test and was confident I did well and yet was rejected afterwards. Has this ever happened to any of you? This wasn't the final round. It's possible I messed up but I'd say that I'm 95 percent sure it was correct and if any of it was off it still would have shown I was fully capable of making a dynamic model with a waterfall and scenarios. The company refused to give feedback and said that was their policy.

12 Comments
 

Could be the reason, could not be the reason. People lie all day every day in this business.

If you're confident you did well then they are probably lying and there's some other reason. You're an associate: you should know not to take anything said at face value at this point.

 

I had a very simple excel test that didn't even involve creating a model, and I'm very confident I got all the questions correct. Got rejected not sure why.

 
Most Helpful

It really depends on how competitive the process is. 

I’ve gone through processes that I felt really good about and have gotten cut (they never provide a reason). On the flip side, I’ve made errors on modeling tests that I catch too late and have still moved forward. In today’s environment, you have to make sure everything is perfect.

It may have nothing to do with your modeling test. Firms have the luxury of being hyper selective on background now. I’ve heard acquisitions/originations roles won’t consider anyone without a background in acquisitions/originations. There are enough people with acquisitions backgrounds from top shops and so they won’t even consider those with brokerage backgrounds or those with AM experience. They may interview you but ultimately cut you at some point despite strong interviews and case studies.

 

Yeah super competitive right now. My firm has been choosing to interview kids with acquisitions experience at subpar/unheard of shops in lieu of AM applicants at MFs lol.

 

Sometimes they use the previous round of interviews combined with the modeling test to eliminate people. Maybe others also had flawless models but they liked their interviews slightly more than yours. They had everyone including you do the models in case the people they liked better in the interviews fucked up in the modeling. It is no effort on their part to have you do the modeling test, even if they didn’t prefer you over others.

 

Highly doubt it was because of the model, or at least not exclusively because of the model

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

I’m went through a case study excel test just over a year ago - I spent a ton of time on it and knew I nailed it. After submitting it, I sent to some mentors in the industry and got unanimous feedback that I killed it and should expect the offer.
Not sure what happened but I was told it was because of the model which I don’t think was fully truthful. I think they ended up hiring a couple people for the program

 

Quis velit unde iste hic occaecati. Architecto rerum laudantium voluptatem illo ab distinctio. Vero est debitis rerum dolorum. Nemo quia nihil quia commodi.

Odio consequatur dolorum laudantium recusandae occaecati repellendus. Asperiores nostrum esse iste recusandae. Ut voluptas quam unde ullam sit consequuntur cumque. Magnam iure delectus tempora et expedita rem nulla. Aut explicabo aut quo reprehenderit cupiditate et doloremque qui. Ea quaerat possimus voluptatem culpa. Quae dignissimos quis ex sed.

Sint et consequatur sunt ratione laborum omnis dolorum. Corrupti pariatur minima et voluptatem voluptatem adipisci et.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”