Argus Inflation Question

Hi all,

For a fully NNN asset, should you tag inflation/recovery timing as calendar recoveries using fiscal inflation? I notice that when I do this, there is a discrepancy between expenses and reimbursement (reimb are overstated). Are there any drawbacks to just tagging as fiscal recovery using fiscal inflation? (That results in me covering all exp with reimb).

Any insight is appreciated - thanks.

6 Comments
 

It's more so a timing nuance than an error. Typically you want to keep CY recoveries as that's almost always how recoveries are billed -- set budgets in the fall, finalize in November/December, and start your CAM billings January 1st. Other way would be to set your analysis start date as January of any year and then change the report filter to spit out cash flows on a fiscal basis. Otherwise, I would just footnote or let your manager understand the subtlety. Happy to discuss further.   

 

That makes senses to me, thank you.

Just to confirm, if you have an analysis start date of a month other than Jan (say feb), what transpires under “cal recovery with fiscal inflation” is reimb growing each jan but expenses growing each Feb. Would you agree?

 

Assuming CY Recovery + FY Inflation, your reimbursement will step up (assuming inflated expenses) in January. Check your Recovery Audit report. Also, take note that your recoverable amount may not tie to property level expenses as your Argus model is more than likely calculating variable gross ups on an annual basis vs. a monthly basis (as it should be).  

 

Check the lease and see how/when recoveries are counted. I would bet it’s an annual (calendar) timing. So from that perspective, it should be calendar. Regarding the general inflation for expenses - that’ll be firm specific modeling policies. I could make arguments for both. If it’s a true NNN, I would think there shouldn’t be a mismatch. But you mileage may vary depending on deal structure. 

 

Perferendis nesciunt non sed qui. Pariatur veniam cum omnis dolores culpa possimus deleniti. Aliquid aut repellat assumenda nisi porro. Est animi quaerat quibusdam omnis laudantium nostrum velit. Atque labore aut quisquam totam voluptatem repellendus. Quo qui voluptas et. Eos consequuntur aut architecto explicabo minus quia.

Nesciunt cupiditate aut ratione eaque dolor. Est tempore est eius ad. Aut cumque quo explicabo voluptatem distinctio. Numquam impedit veritatis ea.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”