40 Comments
 

Seems kinda light for the MD level, are you including value of long-term comp? By MD (and id think before), comp should be nearing the 1/3, 1/3, 1/3rd rule. Meaning a 1/3 for each of salary, annual bonus, and long-term. So if you mean 400-600 for cash parts of first two, sure, but with LT I’d think a bit higher.

Haven’t worked directly for those firms, but my first boss in CRE was a PGIM alum and I feel like he said it was much more at those levels.

 

It could be light but I am just giving my understanding based on candid conversations with my bosses. All in comp, they made what I referenced. At my firm, the only people who made $750 plus, from what I was told, was executive management. Which meant heads of lending, acquisitions and than the executive team who ‘ran’ the firm. To my knowledge, the conversations I had with bosses included their long term compensation. 

 

What do you mean true Life Co? PGIM/Nuveen/NML/NYL and others like AIG / Met Life are all competitors and I would consider them all “Life CO’s”.  Having interviewed at multiple of the above and having worked at a Life Co, I can confirm that they pay within a band and comp to each other. Your competitors on the equity and debt side will generally be these firms. With all that said, PGIM actually pays well and pays (from what I understand) a little higher than everyone else. 
 

Anecdotally, Nuveen’s pay runs in a tight range but if you excel there, they supposedly will give you carry in the funds to assist in getting your pay higher and make up the difference. But nothing is guaranteed and you’re going to start at “Life Co” pay with no guarantee they try to get you higher. 

 
Most Helpful

I mean true lifeco as in primarily manages the money of life and other insurance policy holders of the firm. PGIM and Nuveen may manage house accounts, but they are substantially third party asset management firms and far more diverse. Lots of real estate and other asset mngt teams at lifecos have ventured into the 3rd party world, closed-end fund world, and everything else (money is money after all!), but still are more traditional lifecos at core. 

My belief (to be clear, never worked for a lifeco, just worked deals indirectly with them), is the supposed "low pay" (which is high pay for 99% of the world.. rant of different day), came as a result of the structure (house account money) and low risk tolerance (i.e. the famed low leverage lifeco loans and core assets that they never trade or leverage)... hence the pay follows suit. Opposite are the equity and debt funds that utilize leverage and charge big fees to third party investors, and thus have big internal profits they can pay out (and justify high pay for analysts who work 200% to 300% normal office hours...). 

I guess my main point is is that just like the REITs and asset managers (i.e private equity firms), there are size and class tiers amongst the Lifeco/SWF/pension fund/endowment (i.e. captive money allocators/managers), and I would expect pay gradations to exist here too (scale means a lot). PGIM is much more comparable to CBRE GI or LaSalle or Invesco than NYL or MetLife, so I would expect similar to play out in pay, etc.  

 

85k starting base, ~20-40k bonus for analysts. I am very confident in this.

~120k starting base (not sure if anything changed recently), ~40-60k bonus for associates. Heard from analyst who works there, may or may not be accurate idk.

I think PGIM does a weird thing where they have Sr analysts, so associate pay might even be for 5 years exp

 

Qui eos et ipsum quis delectus. Quae nisi rem autem ratione reprehenderit assumenda ipsum. Voluptatem dolorem placeat qui molestiae ipsum est. Minima qui pariatur nemo quia. Ut nihil recusandae ut ut aspernatur velit magnam.

Rem minus ipsam tempore cum harum. Tempore nulla voluptas et exercitationem sed.

 

Necessitatibus accusamus voluptas aut. Qui a animi quaerat debitis voluptatem. Consequatur asperiores ut ducimus quis maiores nostrum quos. Harum nihil aspernatur cum animi numquam sunt. Qui ullam velit cupiditate saepe. Nemo debitis et doloremque quisquam qui maxime quia ab.

Optio voluptates a sunt debitis. Enim inventore officia architecto ipsam facere esse. Ab quos distinctio ut natus ea reiciendis qui quis. Dicta illum culpa consequatur enim dicta tenetur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”